You are here » home advanced search search results Omoadiphas cannula

Omoadiphas cannula MCCRANIE & CRUZ-DÍAZ, 2010

IUCN Red List - Omoadiphas cannula - Critically Endangered, CR

Can you confirm these amateur observations of Omoadiphas cannula?

Add your own observation of
Omoadiphas cannula »

We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search: Google images

Higher TaxaColubridae (Dipsadinae), Colubroidea, Caenophidia, Alethinophidia, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes)
Subspecies 
Common Names 
SynonymOmoadiphas cannula MCCRANIE & CRUZ-DÍAZ 2010
Omoadiphas cannula — WALLACH et al. 2014: 505 
DistributionHonduras (Sierra de Agalta, Olancho)

Type locality: Montaña de Peña Blanca, Sierra de Agalta, 4 km N of Catacamas, 14°53’26”N, 85°53’46”W, 1250 m elevation, departamento de Olancho, Honduras.  
Reproductionoviparous (not imputed, fide Zimin et al. 2022) 
TypesHolotype: UNAH 1740 (Universidad Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa), an adult male, collected 13 September 1989 by Gustavo A. Cruz. 
DiagnosisDiagnosis: Omoadiphas cannula can be distinguished O. aurula in having 47 subcaudal scales in the male (38–39 in O. aurula; the “male” O. aurula with 35 subcaulals reported by Townsend et al. 2006 is in my opinion a female), six supralabials (seven), seven infralabials (eight), one postocular (two), the posterior nasal contacting the prefrontal (posterior nasal separated from prefrontal by loreal), a dorsal pattern of a dark stripe covering all of scale rows two and three (dark stripe on vertebral row and adjacent halves of scale rows two and three), and dark brown to nearly black ventral surfaces in preservative (pale yellow). Omoadiphas cannula differs from the single know specimen of O. texiguatensis (a subadult female) in having 31 subcaudals in the female (47 in O. texiguatensis) and the dark dorsolateral stripe involving all of scale rows two and three on each side (confined to scale row three). The affinities of the three species of Omoadiphas appear to lie with a group of six other genera of snakes (see Köhler et al. 2001; McCranie & Castañeda 2004) that are part of a larger group referred to as “goo-eaters.” Omoadiphas cannula differs from the species of these six other genera in the following ways: from Adelphicos in having 17 dorsal scale rows (15), 154 ventral scales in the male and 167 in the female (117–155 in both sexes combined), and no anterior temporal (anterior temporal present); from all Atractus in having a divided cloacal scute (entire) and from select species of Atractus in lacking an anterior temporal (anterior temporal present in some Atractus); from Chapinophis in having 154 ventral scales in the male and 167 in the female (178–196 both sexes combined), 47 subcaudal scales in the male (29–40 in both sexes combined), no anterior temporal (anterior temporal present), and no scale row reduction anteriorly on body (scale row reduction present); from Chersodromus in having 154 ventral scales in the male and 167 in the female (124–142 both sexes combined), 47 subcaudal scales in the male (maximum of 43), and a divided cloacal scute (entire); from all Geophis in having a divided cloacal scute (entire) and from select species of Geophis in lacking an anterior temporal (anterior temporal present in some Geophis); and from Ninia in having smooth dorsal scales (strongly keeled), a divided cloacal scute (entire), a striped body pattern (stripes absent), and in lacking an anterior temporal (anterior temporal present). (MCCRANIE & CRUZ-DÍAZ 2010) 
CommentThe new species differs from O. aurula in number of subcaudal, supralabial, infralabial, and postocular scales, in color and pattern, and in having the posterior nasal scale in contact with the prefrontal scale. It differs from O. texiguatensis (known only from a subadult female) in having fewer subcaudals and the dark brown dorsolateral stripe involving all of scale rows two and three on each side of the body. 
EtymologyThe specific name cannula is formed from the Latin word canna (reed, cane) and Latin suffix –ulua (diminutive). The name refers to the Sierra de Agalta where this small snake was collected. The name Agalta is likely formed from the indigenous Pech language acatla (reed grass) and Tla (abundant). 
References
  • McCranie J R 2011. The snakes of Honduras. SSAR, Salt Lake City, 725 pp.
  • McCranie, James R. 2015. A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Honduras, with additions, comments on taxonomy, some recent taxonomic decisions, and areas of further studies needed. Zootaxa 3931 (3): 352–386 - get paper here
  • MCCRANIE, JAMES R. & GUSTAVO A. CRUZ DÍAZ 2010. A third new species of snake of the genus Omoadiphas (Reptilia, Squamata, Colubridae, Dipsadinae) from Honduras. Zootaxa 2690: 53–58 - get paper here
  • Solís, J. M., L. D. Wilson, and J. H. Townsend. 2014. An updated list of the amphibians and reptiles of Honduras, with comments on their nomenclature. Mesoamerican Herpetology 1: 123–144 - get paper here
  • Wallach, Van; Kenneth L. Williams , Jeff Boundy 2014. Snakes of the World: A Catalogue of Living and Extinct Species. [type catalogue] Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 1237 pp.
  • Zimin, A., Zimin, S. V., Shine, R., Avila, L., Bauer, A., Böhm, M., Brown, R., Barki, G., de Oliveira Caetano, G. H., Castro Herrera, F., Chapple, D. G., Chirio, L., Colli, G. R., Doan, T. M., Glaw, F., Grismer, L. L., Itescu, Y., Kraus, F., LeBreton 2022. A global analysis of viviparity in squamates highlights its prevalence in cold climates. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 00, 1–16 - get paper here
 
External links  
Is it interesting? Share with others:

As link to this species use URL address:

https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Omoadiphas&species=cannula

without field 'search_param'. Field 'search_param' is used for browsing search result.



Please submit feedback about this entry to the curator