Tropidophis taczanowskyi (STEINDACHNER, 1880)
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Tropidophis taczanowskyi?
|Higher Taxa||Tropidophiidae, Henophidia, Alethinophidia, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes)|
|Common Names||Taczanowsky's Dwarf Boa.|
|Synonym||Ungalia Taczanowskyi STEINDACHNER 1880|
Ungalia taczanowskyi — BOULENGER 1893: 111
Tropidophis taczanowskyi — STULL 1928: 21
Tropidophis taczanowskyi — MCDIARMID, CAMPBELL & TOURÉ 1999: 222
Tropidophis taczanowskyi — CURCIO et al. 2012
Tropidophis taczanowskyi — WALLACH et al. 2014: 756
|Distribution||Peru, Ecuador (east of the Andes)|
Type locality: Tambillo, Peru. Map legend:
- Region according to the TDWG standard, not a precise distribution map.
NOTE: TDWG regions are generated automatically from the text in the distribution field and not in every cases it works well. We are working on it.
|Types||Syntype: NMW 14858|
Lectotype. NMW 14858, adult female (designated by Curcio et al. 2012).
Paralectotype.—A second specimen, previ- ously considered a syntype, presumably exists but was unlocated (sensu McDiarmid et al., 1999)
|Comment||Illustration: Steindachner’s figure is shown in CURCIO et al. 2012.|
Dates: the year of original description is given as “1870” by CURCIO et al. 2012.
Distribution: In spite of Peters’ (1960) suggestion that the species could also occur in Brazil, no records are known from this country (McDiarmid et al., 1999, Curcio et al. 2012).
Diagnosis.—Distinguishable from other mainland congeners by the following combi- nation of characters: (1) 146–160 ventrals (vs. 164–183 in T. paucisquamis; 200 in T. battersbyi, and 196–203 in T. preciosus); (2) 23 dorsal scales at midbody (vs. dorsals at midbody usually 21 or 23, rarely 25 in T. paucisquamis); (3) vertebral scale row not distinctly enlarged in size relative to remain- ing dorsals (vs. vertebral row of dorsals usually enlarged, wider than long, at least on part of the trunk in T. paucisquamis and T. preciosus); (4) dorsals distinctively keeled except for the first five rows on anterior two-thirds of trunk and the first three rows on the posterior one-third of trunk (vs. dorsals smooth or feebly keeled in T. paucisquamis and smooth in T. battersbyi and T. preciosus); (5) inter- parietals usually present, well developed (vs. interparietals usually absent in T. paucisqua- mis; absent in T. preciosus); (6) parietals usually in slight contact or fully separated by interparietals (vs. parietals in full contact along the middorsal line of head in T. paucisquamis and T. preciosus); (7) up to 20 maxillary teeth (vs. 12 in T. battersbyi); (8) eight spot rows around body, six on dorsum and two on venter (vs. six spot rows around the body, four on dorsum and two on venter in T. battersbyi); and (9) body spotted, dorsal spots usually no larger than one or two dorsals in diameter on paravertebral rows, sometimes becoming longer on flanks resulting in interrupted lateral stripes (vs. body spotted without any tendency to form stripes in all other mainland species) [CURCIO et al. 2012].
Comparisons with other mainland Tropi- dophis.—Segmental counts and head scaling of T. taczanowskyi are rather similar to those of T. grapiuna. In addition, both have distinctively keeled dorsals, although the keels of T. taczanowskyi are stronger. However, besides the difference in general dorsal pattern (see character 7), the conspicuous light occipital spots of T. grapiuna allow its immediate distinction from T. taczanowskyi that has occipital spots being small and irregular in shape (Fig. 24A, C, D in CURCIO et al. 2012)
As link to this species use URL address:
without field 'search_param'. Field 'search_param' is used for browsing search result.