Gymnodactylus amarali BARBOUR, 1925
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Gymnodactylus amarali?
Find more photos by Google images search:
|Higher Taxa||Phyllodactylidae, Gekkota, Sauria, Squamata (lizards: geckos)|
|Common Names||Portuguese: Briba, Lagartixa|
|Synonym||Gymnodactylus amarali BARBOUR 1925: 101|
Gymnodactylus geckoides amarali — VANZOLINI 1953: 251
Gymnodactylus geckoides amarali — WERMUTH 1965: 53
Gymnodactylus geckoides amarali — RÖSLER 2000: 85
Gymnodactylus geckoides amarali — BERTOLOTTO et al. 2004
Gymnodactylus amarali — VANZOLINI 2005
Gymnodactylus carvalhoi VANZOLINI 2005
Gymnodactylus amarali — CASSIMIRO & RODRIGUES 2009
Gymnodactylus carvalhoi — JORGE et al. 2022
|Distribution||Brazil (south of Rio Parnahyba to Rio das Mortes, south to SE Goyaz, east through S Bahia)|
Type locality: Engenheiro Dodt, Santa Philomena, Upper Rio Parnahyba, Brazil.
carvalhoi: Brazil (Cerrado of C Brazil; Tocantins); Type locality: Ipueiras, Tocantins.
|Types||Holotype: MCZ 20682|
Holotype [carvalhoi]: MZUSP 91187, Ipueiras, Tocantins, 26-29.v.2002, ex MVA Planejamento e Consultoria Ambiental.
|Diagnosis||Diagnosis (amarali): Rows of dorsal tubercles 12-16; tubercles in a paramedian row, 33-43; ventrals 19-24; lamellae, 13-19; dorsum and flanks with irregular rows of black, white-centered ocelli; distribution, Central Brasil (present states of Goiás, Tocantins and Mato Grosso) to Piauí [from VANZOLINI 2004]. Known from only 2 specimens fide CASSIMIRO & RODRIGUES 2009.|
DIAGNOSIS (carvalhoi): Color pattern plain or, more frequently, with moderately
marked ocelli. Meristic characters: Dorsal tubercles in 13 – 16 irregular rows (mode 14, 72%); 31 – 49 tubercles in a paramedian row; 17 – 24 transverse
rows of ventral scales; 13 – 21 infradigital lamellae on the fourth toe.
Original diagnosis: “A richly colored gecko with rows of dorsal ocelli and many more or less irregular series of very large tubercles. It differs from G. geckoides (Spix) in having larger and more irregularly arranged dorsal tubercles, in having more longitudinal series of ventral scales and conspicuously in coloration.” (Barbour 1925)
Original description (holotype): “Head little depressed, oviform; snout between 1½ and 1⅓ longer than the orbital diameter; a little longer than the distance be tween eye and ear opening; forehead slightly convex; ear opening roughly oblong and about ⅓ the diameter of the eye. Body and limbs normal; digits slightly depressed at the base with transverse plates below. Snout covered with rather large and more or less round granules, the largest on the anterior portion of the snout; smaller granules interspersed with slightly larger ones covering all other portions of the head; rostral slightly broader than high, with medium cleft above; nostril between the rostral, a supranasal, two postnasals, and on one side, the anterior upper corner of the first supralabial; upper labials, the last very small, 6 lower labials, first by far the largest; mental very large, rounded posteriorly; a pair of chin shields behind the mental widely separated on the median line. Body covered with small scales, which incline to be imbricate, and irregular rows of large tubercles, those along the middorsal line being large, flat and keeled, while the rows along the sides of the body are composed of keeled but much more projecting tubercles altogether about 15 longitudinal series; abdominal scales cycloid imbricate in about 21 longitudinal series. The tail is missing.” (Barbour 1925)
|Comment||Vanzolini (2005) included under G. carvalhoi all specimens of Gymnodactylus from the Central Brazilian Cerrado currently attributed to Gymnodactylus geckoides amarali. Although Vanzolini did not examine the holotype of Barbour (1925), he redefined and redescribed G. amarali based on a single juvenile specimen he collected at Alto Parnaíba, state of Maranhão, in the surroundings of the type locality. Recognizing this specimen as the only other example of G. amarali he decided to allocate all other specimens from the Cerrado previously assigned to G. geckoides amarali, in his new species. CASSIMIRO & RODRIGUES 2009 think that Vanzolini was in error and synonymized G. carvalhoi with G. amarali.|
|Etymology||Named after Dr. Afranio do Amaral (1894-1982), Brazilian physician, zoologist, herpetologist, and Director of the Instituto Butantan (1919-1921 and 1928-1938).|
Etymology (carvalhoi): Named after Celso Morato de Carvalho (Universidade Federal de Sergipe), old friend, colleague and field companion, who collected the specimen.
Is it interesting? Share with others:
As link to this species use URL address:
without field 'search_param'. Field 'search_param' is used for browsing search result.