Cylindrophis jodiae AMARASINGHE, INEICH, CAMPBELL & HALLERMANN, 2015
Find more photos by Google images search: ![]()
| Higher Taxa | Cylindrophiidae, Henophidia, Alethinophidia, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes) |
| Subspecies | |
| Common Names | E: Jodi’s Pipe-Snake |
| Synonym | Cylindrophis jodiae AMARASINGHE, INEICH, CAMPBELL & HALLERMANN in AMARASINGHE et al. 2015 Cylindrophis jodii AMARASINGHE et al. 2015 (see comment) Cylindrophis jodiae — WANG et al. 2022 |
| Distribution | C Vietnam, China (Fujian) Type locality: Annam, Central Vietnam |
| Reproduction | viviparous (manual imputation, fide Zimin et al. 2022) |
| Types | Holotype: MNHN-RA 1911.0196, SVL 415 mm, collected by the French botanist Philippe Eberhardt, without precise date, but before 1911. Paratypes (10): MNHN-RA 1974.1251, (SVL 391 mm), collected in the area of Saigon, southern Vietnam, by Ser- gent Poilane before 1974; MNHN-RA 1885.0100–103, (SVL 265, 264, 146, 177 mm), collected in Cochinchina, southern Vietnam, by Girard before 1885; MNHN-RA 1885.0098–99, (SVL 375, 656 mm), collected in Cochinchina, southern Vietnam, by Girard before 1885; MNHN-RA 1935.0001, (SVL 271 mm), collected in Cochinchina, southern Vietnam, by René Bourret before 1935; MNHN-RA 1974.1253, (SVL 192 mm), collected in the area of Saigon, southern Vietnam, by Sergent Poilane before 1974; BMNH 1920.1.20.2649, (SVL 345 mm), collected from Long-Xuyen, Vietnam by F. Lataste, collection date unknown. |
| Diagnosis | Diagnosis: Cylindrophis jodiae sp. nov. is distinguished from all congeners by having the following characters: 21 midbody scale rows (vs. 17 in C. engkariensis; 19 in C. boulengeri, C. burmanus, C. melanotus, C. ruffus; 23 in C. aruensis, C. opisthorhodus), 182–196 ventrals (vs. 217–225 in C. isolepis), wide and interrupted bands on the back (vs. lateral and middorsal stripes along the body in C. lineatus; two series of large reddish-brown spots along the back, which are enclosed by a black network in C. maculatus; no bands and paler back in C. yamdena). |
| Comment | Nomenclature: The paper by Amarasinghe et al. (2015) exists in two versions, an earlier one, in which Fig. 8 lists the names of the new species as C. jodii and C. mirzai, and a revised version in which these errors have been corrected (Kieckbusch et al. 2016). |
| References |
|
| External links |
