You are here » home advanced search search results Diplolaemus crypticus

Diplolaemus crypticus VRDOLJAK, AVILA, MOLINA, BENITEZ-VEYRA & MORANDO, 2026

Can you confirm these amateur observations of Diplolaemus crypticus?

Add your own observation of
Diplolaemus crypticus »

Find more photos by Google images search: Google images

Higher TaxaLeiosauridae (Leiosaurinae), Iguania, Sauria, Squamata (lizards)
Subspecies 
Common Names 
SynonymDiplolaemus crypticus VRDOLJAK, AVILA, MOLINA, BENITEZ-VEYRA & MORANDO 2026: 11
Diplolaemus bibronii — BELL 1843 (part)
Diplolaemus bibronii — BURT & BURT 1930
Diplolaemus bibronii — DONOSO-BARROS 1966
Diplolaemus bibronii — PETERS et al. 1970
Diplolaemus bibronii — BOTTARI 1976
Diplolaemus bibronii — CEI 1986
Diplolaemus darwinii — BOULENGER 1885
Diplolaemus darwinii — CEI 1973.
Diplolaemus sexcinctus — CEI et al. 2021
Diplolaemus sexcinctus — MORANDO et al. 2015.
Diplolaemus sexcinctus L3 — FEMENIAS et al. 2020
Diplolaemus sexcinctus L3 – VRDOLJAK et al. 2025 
DistributionArgentina (Chubut)

Type locality: Ruta Nacional 40, 39 km N to Gobernador Costa (43° 51’ 22.5’’ S, 70° 54 57.4’’ W, 859 m), Tehuelces Department, Chubut Province, Argentina  
Reproduction 
TypesHolotype (Fig. 7): LJAMM 17031, Adult male, Collected by L.J. Avila on 30 January 2016. Paratopoypes (Supporting Information, Figs S7, S8): LJAMM 17035 adult female with same date and collector as holotype. Paratypes (Supporting Information, Figs S7, S8): LJAMM 2127 (45° 25’ 54’’S, 69° 50’ 25’’ W, 502 m, Río Senguer Department, collected by L.J. Avila and M. Morando on 25 January 2000), 13076 (45° 26’ 01.1’’ S, 69° 50’ 17.3’’ W, 479 m, Río Senger Department, collected by L.J. Avila, M. Kozykariski, M.F. Breitman and R. Martinez on 15 March 2010), 13079 (44° 43’ 51.7’’S, 70° 00’ 13.4’’ W, 567 m, Tehuelches Department, same collectors and date as 13076), 13082 (43° 26’ 23.9’’S, 70° 00’ 12.7’’ W, 743 m, Languiñeo Department, same collectors and date as 13076), 15603 (43° 54’ 31.3’’ S, 70° 18’ 45.9’’ W, 1072, Tehuelches Department, Collected by M.A. Gonzalez Marin, C.H.F. Pérez & L.J. Avila), adult males. 3657, 3658 (both from 43° 33’ 43.8’’ S, 71° 10’ 01.3’’ W, 816 m, Languiñeo Department, collected by N. Frutos, C.H.F. Pérez, M. Morando, P. Frutos, L.J. Avila and T. Avila on 9 February 2006), 11616 (from 43° 54’ 34.5’’ S, 70° 18’ 49.2’’ W, 1085 m, Tehuelches Department, collected by L.J. Avila, M. Kozykariski, M. Nicola, M.F. Breitman and N. Feltrin), 15590, 15591 (44° 43’ 37.8’’ S, 69° 36’ 48.9’’ W, 892, Sarmiento Department, collected by M.A. Gonzalez Marin, C.H.F. Pérez and L.J. Avila), 15604 (same as 15603), adult females. All specimens were collected in Chubut Province, Argentina. 
DiagnosisDiagnosis: Diplolaemus crypticus is genetically distinct from the other described species of the clade and can be statistically distinguished from them with at least 95% confidence based on several individual morphological traits (Supporting Information, Fig. S9, mean values of TL = 14.20 mm, HH = 10.82 mm, HL = 21.58 mm, SVL = 77.10 mm, SNG = 63.04, SSS = 3.17, SNR = 2.78, LM = 16.91, ANAS =11.83, ILS = 11.39, SLS = 12.35, VS = 178.6, DS = 177.5, and SAMB = 180) from D. bibronii (HH = 12.56 mm, SLS = 11.60), D. darwinii (TL = 11.42 mm, HL = 1.98 mm, SVL = 67.38 mm, SNG = 55.61, SSS = 1.91, SNR = 1.61, LM = 18.43, ANAS = 10.78, ILS = 9.26, and SLS = 10.13), D. leopardinus (SLS = 11.64, and DS = 164.55 mm), D. sexcinctus (SVL = 87.01 mm, SNG = 71.49, SNR = 3.08, LM = 18.73, VS = 189.27, DS = 185.11, SAMB = 187.27), D. vulcanus (SVL = 89.85 mm, SNG = 73, SSS = 3.67, SNR = 3.11, LM = 18.94, VS = 192.72, DS = 187.56, SAMB = 197.28). (VRDOLJAK et al. 2026)


Unfortunately we had to temporarily remove additional information as this was scraped by multiple AI companies who sell that data. However, these details, e.g. detailed descriptions (about about 3.26 pages) are available for collaborators and contributors. Please contact us if you need any of this material. 
CommentDistribution: see map in Vrdoljak et al. 2026: Fig. 1, and guess which color and lineage this species is (we hope it’s there). 
EtymologyNamed from the term ‘cryptic’ which is used commonly in zoological literature to indicate species that are virtually indistinguishable morphologically; from the Greek krypto meaning hide or conceal, in reference to be difficult to differentiate this species from relatived species given that the highest phenotypic variation of the genus. 
References
  • Vrdoljak, Juan; Luciano Javier Avila, Iriel Surai Molina, Santiago Benitez-Veyra, Mariana Morando 2026. A guided protocol for phenotypic analyses in integrative taxonomy: application to Diplolaemus (Iguania: Leiosauridae) and the description of new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, Volume 207, Issue 1, May 2026, zlag064, - get paper here
 
External links  
Is it interesting? Share with others:


Please submit feedback about this entry to the curator