You are here » home › advanced search › Helminthophis frontalis

Helminthophis frontalis (PETERS, 1860)

IUCN Red List - Helminthophis frontalis - Data Deficient, DD
iNaturalist logo

Can you confirm these amateur observations of Helminthophis frontalis?

Add your own observation of
Helminthophis frontalis »

We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search: Google images

Higher TaxaAnomalepididae, Typhlopoidea, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes)
Subspecies 
Common NamesE: Costa Rica Blind Snake 
SynonymTyphlops (Helminthophis) frontalis PETERS 1860: 517
Helminthophis frontalis — PETERS 1881
Helminthophis frontalis — BOULENGER 1893: 5
Helminthophis frontalis — AMARAL 1924: 25
Helminthophis frontalis — TAYLOR 1951: 26
Helminthophis frontalis — MCDIARMID, CAMPBELL & TOURÉ 1999: 49
Helminthophis frontalis — SAVAGE 2002
Helminthophis frontalis — WALLACH et al. 2014: 324 
DistributionCosta Rica, Panama

Type locality: “Costa Rica”  
Reproductionoviparous 
TypesSyntypes: ZMB 3823, 3925 
DiagnosisDiagnosis (genus): Members of the genus share the following distinctive characteristics that will distinguish them from other genera of blind worm snakes: enlarged, nonpolygonal head plates that have rounded, posterior margins; prefrontal plates meeting on the midline to separate rostral and pre-frontal; frontal enlarged, rounded, and similar in appearance to dorsal scales, but about twice as large. Scale rows around midbody 20 to 24; tail with a terminal spine. Helminthophis differs from the extralimital Typhlophis in head scutellation, since the upper head scales in the latter genus are similar in size and shape to the dorsal scutes (Savage 2002: 554).


Additional details (581 characters) are available for collaborators and contributors. Please contact us for details. 
CommentType species: Typhlops (Helminthophis) frontalis PETERS 1860: 517 is the type species of the genus Helminthophis PETERS 1860.

Key: Amaral 1924 provided a key to all Helminthophis known at the time, including many species that are included in Liotyphlops today. 
EtymologyNamed after Latin frontalis, related to the forehead. [“...Diese Wurmschlange hat die abgerundete Schnauze und die seitlichen Augen, welche die Gattung Typhlops kennzeichnen, und stimmt durch die außerordentliche Ausdehnung des Prä-frontalschildes mit Typhlops flavoterminatus Pet...”].

The genus was named after Greek helminthos (ἕλμινθος), worm + Greek ophis (ὄφῖς), serpent, snake. ["…Diese Wurmschlange hat die abgerundete Schnauze und die seitlichen Augen…"]. 
References
  • Amaral, A. do 1924. Helminthophis. Proc. New England zool. Club 9: 25-30
  • Bauer, A.M.; Günther,R. & Klipfel,M. 1995. The herpetological contributions of Wilhelm C.H. Peters (1815-1883). SSAR Facsimile Reprints in Herpetology, 714 pp.
  • Boulenger, G.A. 1893. Catalogue of the snakes in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) I. London (Taylor & Francis), 448 pp. - get paper here
  • Köhler, G. 2008. Reptiles of Central America. 2nd Ed. Herpeton-Verlag, 400 pp.
  • McDiarmid, R.W.; Campbell, J.A. & Touré,T.A. 1999. Snake species of the world. Vol. 1. [type catalogue] Herpetologists’ League, 511 pp.
  • Peters, WILHELM C. H. 1881. Einige herpetologische Mittheilungen. 1. Uebersicht der zu den Familien der Typhlopes und Stenostomi gehörigen Gattungen oder Untergattungen. 2. Ueber eine neue Art von Tachydromus aus dem Amurlande. 3. Ueber die von Herrn Dr. finsch aus Polynesien g Sitzungs-Ber. Gesellsch.Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1881 (4): 69-72.
  • Peters, Wilhem Carl Hartwig 1860. Drei neue Schlangen des k. zoologischen Museums aus America und Bemerkungen über die generelle Unterscheidung von anderen bereits bekannten Arten. Monatsber. königl. Akad. Wiss. Berlin. 1860 (October): 517-521 - get paper here
  • Ray, Julie M. and Patty Ruback 2015. Updated checklists of snakes for the provinces of Panamá and Panamá Oeste, Republic of Panama. Mesoamerican Herpetology 2 (2): 168-188 - get paper here
  • Savage, J.M. 2002. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica: A Herpetofauna Between Two Continents, Between Two Seas. University of Chicago Press, 934 pp. [review in Copeia 2003 (1): 205]
  • Solorzano, A. 2004. Serpientes de Costa Rica - Snakes of Costa Rica. Editorial INBio, Costa Rica, 792 pp.
  • Taylor,E.H. 1951. A brief review ot the snakes of Costa Rica. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 34 (1): 3-188 - get paper here
  • Wallach, Van; Kenneth L. Williams , Jeff Boundy 2014. Snakes of the World: A Catalogue of Living and Extinct Species. [type catalogue] Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 1237 pp.
 
External links  
Is it interesting? Share with others:


Please submit feedback about this entry to the curator