Acontias meleagris (LINNAEUS, 1758)
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Acontias meleagris?
Acontias meleagris
Find more photos by Google images search: 
| Higher Taxa | Scincidae, Acontiinae (Acontidae), Scincoidea, Sauria, Squamata (lizards) |
| Subspecies | |
| Common Names | E: Cape Legless Skink, Golden Sand Skink; Spotted Slow Skink; Thick-tailed Blindworm, Erdslang, Linnaeus' Lance Skink |
| Synonym | Anguis Meleagris LINNAEUS 1758: 227 Acontias meleagris — DUMÉRIL & BIBRON 1839: 802 Acontias meleagris — LOVERIDGE 1923 Acontias meleagris meleagris — FITZSIMONS 1943: 242 Acontias meleagris — GREER 2001 Acontias meleagris — LAMB et al. 2010 |
| Distribution | Republic of South Africa (along the xeric western and eastern Cape coast of South Africa) Type locality: “Indiis” (fide LINNAEUS 1758; in error) |
| Reproduction | ovovivparous |
| Types | Syntypes: Lost. Described from a specimen in the Museum Adolphi Friderici (now in NRM), from Indiis (in error, the species is African), and reference to a specimen described by Seba. The NRM specimen is now lost (Andersson, 1899), and the specimen used by Seba has not been traced. Fitzsimons 1943: 244 said that the type is unlocated but suspected it in MNHN. |
| Diagnosis | Diagnosis (genus Acontias): Morphologically, members of the genus Acontias have SVLs that range from 225 mm to 490 mm, while the midbody scale rows range from 14 to 20 within this group (Broadley & Greer 1969). Biogeographically this group is distributed further along the west and south coasts of southern African eastwards into the interior of the subcontinent that includes Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe extending into south-eastern Kenya. Within this group, systematic affinities, particularly in the highly polymorphic Acontias meleagris complex (comprising A. m. meleagris, A. m. orientalis, the morph lineacauda and A. p. tasmani), warrant additional study (Daniels et al. 2005). A study in currently in progress that will attempt to delineate species boundaries within this complex. Convergence in apparent diagnostic features appears widespread among fossorial taxa. For example, two independent studies performed by Whiting et al. (2004) and Schmitz et al. (2005) suggest that the Malagasy fossorial skink genus Amphiglossus as currently defined is not monophyletic and is comprised of two genetically highly distinct groups. These results suggest that morphological characters currently used in the taxonomy of fossorial skinks are homoplastic and warrant closer scrutiny. The apparent lack of well-defined synapomorphies at least for some genera is clearly an obstacle in determining the diversity of fossorial groups. The description of this new genus within Acontias suggests that a number of previously defined generic groupings in other skinks may indeed be artificial units, and that a number of the southern African skink genera may contain considerable taxonomic diversity obscured by symplesiomorphic morphological features. From an evolutionary perspective, the morphological differences between Acontias and Microacontias gen. nov. pose some interesting questions. We hypothesize that it is likely that the differences in body size have led to the development of reproductive differences between these two ecomorphological groups that are likelyenforced by resource partitioning among sympatric taxa. We recommend that where taxonomically ill-defined paraphyletic groups have been recorded with mtDNA sequences, they should be confirmed with the use of nDNA sequences; and where congruent, the appropriate taxonomic changes made to relect current trends in phylogenetic hypotheses. Such studies are likely to uncover a wealth of new genera and taxa that have previously been obscured by convergent characters, particularly among fossorial groups. Considering that most fossorial taxa have limited vagility, and a large number are point endemics, the effective conservation of this faunal group and their vulnerability to extinction underscore the need for a sound taxonomy that accurately reflects diversity and evolutionary history [from DANIELS et al. 2006]. Additional details (1898 characters) are available for collaborators and contributors. Please contact us for details. |
| Comment | Limb morphology: Limbless. Skull morphology: for a comparison of African burrowing skinks see Stepanova & Bauer 2021. Type species: A. meleagris is the type species of the genus Acontias CUVIER 1817 (DANIELS et al. 2006, LAMB et al. 2010). Acontias is also the type genus of the family Acontidae Gray 1839 (fide Hedges 2014) and Acontiinae Gray 1839 (fide Shea 2021). Synonymy: based on DNA sequence data, DANIELS et al. (2005) suggest that both A. m. orientalis and A. p. tasmani are invalid taxonomic designations, and should be regarded as junior synonyms of A. m. meleagris. Key: Broadley & Greer 1969: 14 have a key to the species of Acontias. Group: the A. meleagris species complex includes A. meleagris, A. orientalis and A. lineicauda fide Zhao et al. 2023. |
| References |
|
| External links |