Eremias killasaifullahi MASROOR, KHAN, NADEEM, AMIR, KHISROON & JABLONSKI, 2022
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Eremias killasaifullahi?
Eremias killasaifullahi
We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search: 
| Higher Taxa | Lacertidae, Eremiadinae, Sauria, Lacertoidea, Squamata (lizards) |
| Subspecies | |
| Common Names | E: Killa Saifullah’s Racerunner |
| Synonym | Eremias killasaifullahi MASROOR, KHAN, NADEEM, AMIR, KHISROON & JABLONSKI 2022 |
| Distribution | Iran (Balochistan) Type locality: Kunder, Torghar Mountains, Killa Saifullah district, Balochistan (31.3247° N, 68.5452° E; elevation 1,920 m a. s. l. (Fig. 7D in Masroor et al. 2022) |
| Reproduction | |
| Types | Holotype. PMNH 3613 (cyt b: MT554460; Rag1: MT554498), an adult male, collected March 23, 2017, leg. Rafaqat Masroor (Fig. 3). Paratypes. Males: PMNH 3614–3616 (cyt b: MT554466, MT554456, n/a; Rag1: MT554478, MT554482, n/a). Females: PMNH 4046 (cyt b: MT554453; Rag1: MT554479), PMNH 4050 (cyt b: MT554473; Rag1: MT554483), PMNH 4055 (cyt b: MT554455; Rag1: MT554481). Juveniles: PMNH 3673 (cyt b: n/a; Rag1: n/a), PMNH 4045 (cyt b: MT554467; Rag1: MT554486), PMNH 4052 (cyt b: MT554459; Rag1: MT554497). PMNH 3614–16, 3673 collected along with the holotype; PMNH 4045, 4052, September 5, 2018, Zamkai Nala, Tanishpa, Killa Saifullah district, leg. Rafaqat Masroor; PMNH 4046, 4055 August 31, 2018, Ashewat, Qamar Din Karez, Zhob district, leg. Rafaqat Masroor; PMNH 4050, September 1, 2018, Zamkai Nala, Tanishpa, Killa Saifullah district, leg. Rafaqat Masroor (Figs. 5, 6). |
| Diagnosis | Morphological diagnosis. A medium-sized lacertid lizard, maximum snout-vent length (SVL) = 70.5 mm, tail 1.67 to 1.97 times longer than body length (SVL), hindlimbs relatively long (HLL/SVL ratio 0.6–0.8); subocular scale reaching to the edge of the mouth, 5–7 (mainly 6, rarely 5) anterior to subocular; dorsals 53–63; ventrals in 14–18 oblique longitudinal series; frontal separated from supraoculars; the height of the first two to three transverse rows of ventral scales in the pectoral region more than its breadth; 17–24 femoral pores on each side, separated medially by 1–5 scales (mainly 2–4, rarely 1), the space between the femoral pores less than one–fourth length of each row; toes without fringe, encircled by three scales in a single series of 21–25 unicarinate and bicarinate scales underneath; tip of the fourth toe reaches to the forelimb and extends to just behind the collar. The adult specimens are creamy beige in life with seven light stripes appearing on the neck which transforms into ocelli and vermiculation behind the neck. No dorsolateral broader dark stripes, an outer-most series of white and black ocelli starts behind the eyes on each side, onto the tympanum and flanks above the forelimb and hindlimb insertion. (Masroor et al. 2022) Description of the holotype. SVL: 65.3, TL: 109.7, HL: 17.4, HW: 10.2, HH: 8.1, TrL: 28.3, HLL: 44.8, FLL: 26.6, FrL: 4.6, FrW: 2.3.An adult male of E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. preserved in ethanol in a good state of preservation (Fig. 3); head and body moderately depressed; tail long, ca. 1.7 times longer than the body, cylindrical and depressed at the base. Head relativelylong (HL/SVL ratio 0.27) (Fig. 3), 1.7 times longer than wide (HW/HL ratio 0.59), head height less than head width (HH/HW, 0.79). Limbs strong, hindlimbs 1.6 times more than the length of forelimbs (FLL/HLL, 0.59), hindlimbs comprise 1.4 times the body length (HLL/SVL, 0.69). Head broader than the neck; nasals, frontonasal, prefrontals, frontal, frontoparietals, interparietal and parietals are smooth and convex. Nasals are moderately swollen, three nasals, the lower in contact with three supralabials on the right and left side, its contact with the rostral lacking (Fig. 3D). Supranasals in contact with rostral and first supralabial, the suture between them is four times the length of frontonasal, whose breadth is ca. 1.1 times its length; length of prefrontals 1.4 times its width, joined by a median suture; frontal two times as long as broad, its length slightly less than its distance from the tip of the snout, narrow behind; parietals smooth, slightly longer than wide; interparietal smooth, more than half of the length of frontoparietals; no occipital. Two large supraoculars, about equal in size, the space anterior to supraoculars filled by few small and three to five larger granules; both supraoculars in contact with frontal of their sides while separated from supraciliaries by a series of granules (Fig. 3C), behind the two large spraoculars a single, comparatively medium-sized, granule exist; six supraciliaries, first longest, its length shorter than its distance from the first loreal. Rostral pentagonal, broader than high, narrower beneath than above; anterior loreal slightly higher than wide, shorter than the second loreal which is longer than high; supralabials 8; subocular keeled just below the eye, bordering the mouth, wedged between fifth and sixth supralabials (Fig. 3D). Temporals smooth, a large scale above ear; auricular denticulation indistinct or three small scales forming slight denticulation anteriorly. Lower eyelid covered with numerous small semi-transparent scales. Six infralabials, gradually increasing in size posteriorly. Five pairs of chin shields; anterior three completely in contact, the fourth one separated by six smaller gulars, the fifth one is in contact with fifth and sixth infralabials on both sides. Collar curved, free, serrated and composed of 10 plates larger than adjacent gulars, the middle one slightly enlarged than others. Gular fold distinct, 20 gular scales in a straight line between the symphysis of the chin shields and the collar (Fig. 3B). Dorsal scales granular, smooth, 60 across the middle of the body. Ventral plates broader than long (except for outermost series), forming oblique longitudinal series of 16 plates across mid-belly and 25 transverse rows counted from behind collar to vent; first three rows of ventral scales in the pectoral region behind collar longer than broad, the first row is twice as long as broad. Precloacal region with an enlarged median plate just above the vent, surrounded by four large scales. Forelimb ca. 1.5 times longer than the head, upper surface of the arm with rhombic, smooth scales. Scales on the upper surface of hindlimbs similar to dorsals, varying in size; ventral surface of hindlimbs covered by enlarged plates, the lower surface of the tibia with one row of very large and one comparatively smaller plates, the tip of the fourth toe reaches to the forelimb and extends to just behind the collar; 17 femoral pores on the right side, the left side damaged, the two series separated by two scales, length of the interfemoral space not greater than one-fourth length of each row. Toes slender, compressed, with no fringe. Subdigital lamellae unicarinate, in a single row of 21 scales under the 4th toe, a total of three scales around the 4th toe. Upper caudal scales oblique, truncate, strongly and diagonally keeled, 26 scales in the 9th –10th annulus behind the postcloacal granules. (Masroor et al. 2022) Coloration in life. The adult specimens (Fig. 7E) are creamy beige with ocellate body pattern. Seven light stripes appear on the neck which transforms into ocelli and vermiculation behind the neck. Of the seven, the lateral- most light stripe originates from behind the eye and runs on the outer edge of the parietal, transforming into a disconnected series of white ocelli edged with black, running up to anterior one-third of the tail. Next to the lateral- most, the paravertebral light stripe originates from behind the parietal and transforms into closely-connected white ocelli edged with black and runs on the tail short of lateral-most ocelli. Next to paravertebral light stripe, there exists a light nuchal stripe on each side and the light vertebral stripe, the three joins behind the neck and transform into white ocelli edged with black in the pattern of vermiculation. In addition to seven light stripes on the neck, an outer- most series of white and black ocelli starts behind the eyes on each side, onto the tympanum and flanks above the forelimb and hindlimb insertion. The upper parts of both hindlimbs and forelimbs are provided with white and black ocelli. Head gray with black mottled markings or spots; supralabials white with black markings. Belly and underside of tail creamy white, tail dorsum grayish. The juveniles and subadults (Fig. 6) are nearly similar in coloration to the adults except for the following details; seven longitudinal light stripes on the neck, the lateral-most originate from behind the eye, running on the outer parietals and continuing onto the dorsum in the form of connected small white ocelli, terminating on the one-third of the tail, the paravertebral light stripe originates from the posterior of parietals, and merge short of the lateral-most stripe on the tail, the nuchal of each side and vertebral light stripe merge after the neck to form light vermiculation up to the base of the tail. An additional outer-most light stripe originates from behind the tympanum and is produced in the form of disconnected white ocelli above the insertion of forelimbs and hindlimbs. The upper parts of hindlimbs and forelimbs are provided with white and black ocelli. Head gray with black mottled markings or spots; supralabials white with black markings. Belly and underside of tail creamy white, tail dorsum creamy grayish. (Masroor et al. 2022) Sexual and age dimorphism. Apparently, males attain larger sizes than females in E. killasaifullahi sp. nov.: male SVL to 70.5 mm, female SVL 58.1 mm. Moreover, males have generally longer hindlimbs and shorter trunks as compared to females. For a larger female having SVL of 58.5 mm (PMNH 4050), the hindlimb is 37.9 mm against a same-sized male (PMNH 3616, SVL 59.4 mm) which has a hindlimb length of 43.1 mm. Similarly, the trunk length of a smaller female PMNH 4050 (SVL 58.5 mm) is 29.0 mm against a larger male (PMNH 3614, SVL 67.9 mm) which has a trunk length of 28.1 mm. The dorsal body color and pattern are, however, similar in juveniles and adults of both genders (Figs. 3, 5–7). (Masroor et al. 2022) Comparisons. The new species Eremias killasaifullahi sp. nov. is strikingly different from species exhibiting striped and ocellate pattern (E. aria; E. kopetdaghica; E. lalezharica; E. papenfussi; Eremias persica; E. regeli; E. fahimii; E. isfahanica; E. montana; E. nikolskii; E. velox) and ocellate pattern (E. afghanistanica; E. nigrocellata; E. strauchi; E. suphani; Table 1 and S1). Eremias killasaifullahi sp. nov. can be distinguished from E. afghanistanica by a higher count of dorsals (53–63 vs. 44–46), caudal scales in the 9th–10th annulus (24–33 vs. 20–26) and a lower number of ventral scales in a single row from the posterior edge of collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 37–38). From E. persica, E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs by its smaller size (SVL up to 70.5 mm vs. 98.0 mm), size of the second loreal scale to first loreal scale (more than two times vs. two times), supracaudals (strongly keeled vs. weakly keeled), the dorsal color and pattern in adults (ocellate without broader lateralmost stripe vs. striped and ocellate with broader lateralmost stripe) and tail coloration in the juveniles (creamy grayish vs. bluish). Besides distant distribution, Eremias killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs from the recently described E. fahimii by its comparatively larger size (SVL up to 70.5 mm vs. 56.0 mm), more SDLT 4th (21–25 vs. 20–21), lower count of caudal scales in the 9th–10th annulus (22–27 vs. 31), the greater number of scales separating the femoral pores (1–5 vs. 1) and the dorsal color and pattern in adults (dorsal stripes broken into ocelli without broader lateralmost stripe vs. dorsal stripes persistent throughout life with broader lateralmost stripe). From E. isfahanica, E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs in the following morphological characters apart from its distant distribution: higher count of supralabials (8–11 vs. 6–8), 5–7 of them (mainly 6, rarely 5) located anterior to subocular (vs. 5), lower count of collars (10–12 vs. 12–15), number of ventral scales in a single row from the posterior edge of collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 30–33) and the dorsal color pattern in adults (dorsal stripes broken into ocelli vs. dorsal stripes persistent throughout life). Eremias killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs from E. kopetdaghica in having comparatively higher count of dorsals (53–63 vs. 48–59), collars (10–12 vs. 7) and the dorsal color and pattern in adults. Eremias killasaifullahi sp. nov. can be distinguished from E. lalezharica in having a lower number of ventral scales in a single row from posterior edge of collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 30–33), gulars (20–33 vs. 33–40), collars (10–12 vs. 13–15), generally higher count of femoral pores (17–24 vs. 15–19), pair of chin shields/ submaxillary shields (5 vs. 4), contact of gulars with second pair of submaxillary shields (none vs. 1-2 rows) and dorsal color and pattern (ocellate vs. ocellated and striped). Apart from its peculiar distribution in the remote valley in Torghar Mountains, E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. can be differentiated from E. montana in the following set of characters: comparatively larger size (SVL up to 70.5 mm vs. 58.5 mm), lower count of dorsals (53–63 vs. 63–68), higher number of ventral scales in a row across mid-belly in the widest part (14–18 vs. 13–14), infralabials (6–10 vs. 4–6), number of supralabials anterior to the subocular (5–6 vs. 4–5), generally higher count of scales separating the femoral pores (1–5 vs. 2), three scales around the penultimate phalanx of 4th toe (vs. 4) and dorsal color and pattern (ocellated vs. striped and ocellate). Besides having a subocular scale bordering mouth and ocellate dorsal pattern, E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs from E. nigrocellata by its smaller size (SVL up to 70.5 mm vs. 83.0 mm), higher count of dorsals (53–63 vs. 42–56) and the number of femoral pores on each side (17–24 vs. 11–13). E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs from E. nikolskii by having a higher count of ventral scales in a row across mid-belly in the widest part (14–18 vs. 14), lower number of ventral scales in a single row from the posterior edge of collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 28–32) and dorsal color and pattern (ocellate vs. striped and ocellate). Besides the dorsal color and pattern, our new species stands distinguished from E. papenfussi by having a lower number of ventral scales in a single row from the posterior edge of the collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 30–33), 5–6 (mainly 6) number of scales anterior to subocular (vs. 5), generally higher count of scales separating the femoral pores (1–5 vs. 1–2). From E. regeli, E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs in having three scales around the penultimate phalanx of 4th toe (vs. four scales), higher count of gulars (20–33 vs. 14–24), ventral scales in a row across mid-belly in the widest part (14–18 vs. 13), generally higher count of caudal scales in the 9th–10th annulus (22–27 vs. 17–25) and dorsal color and pattern (ocellate vs. striped and ocellate). The new species E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. can be easily differentiated from E. strauchi by its distant distribution, lower number of ventral scales in a single row from the posterior edge of collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 28–33), and 5–6 (mainly 6) number of scales anterior to subocular (vs. 7). From E. suphani, E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs by its distant distribution, lower number of ventral scales in a single row from the posterior edge of collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 29–34) and arrangement of gulars (2 rows of gulars reaching to the second pair of chin shields vs. no such arrangement). The new species E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. can be easily differentiated from E. velox by its distant distribution, contact of infranasal to rostral (separated vs. in contact) and dorsal color and pattern. From E. rafiqi sp. nov., E. killasaifullahi sp. nov. differs in the following morphological characters: color pattern (ocellate vs. striped and ocellate), smaller size (SVL up to 70.5 mm vs. 99.3 mm), contact of infranasal with the rostral (separated vs. in contact), lower number of ventral scales in a single row from the posterior edge of collar to the vent (25–29 vs. 29–33) and generally lower count of gulars (20–33 vs. 29–33). (Masroor et al. 2022) |
| Comment | |
| Etymology | We derived the name of the new species from Killa Saifullah, a city and district in northwestern Balochistan province, Pakistan that represents the area, from where this newly discovered endemic species of Eremias (subgenus Aspidorhinus) is currently known. The region plays an important role for producing fruits, nuts and vegetables in Pakistan. The discovery of this species of lizards thus highlights the importance of this region from the biodiversity point of view. |
| References |
|
| External links |