You are here » home advanced search Microlophus arenarius

Microlophus arenarius (TSCHUDI, 1845)

Can you confirm these amateur observations of Microlophus arenarius?

Add your own observation of
Microlophus arenarius »

Find more photos by Google images search: Google images

Higher TaxaTropiduridae, Iguania, Sauria, Squamata (lizards)
Subspecies 
Common Names 
SynonymSteironotus (Eulophus) arenarius TSCHUDI 1845: 154
Tropidurus stolzmanni STEINDACHNER 1891: 376
Tropidurus tschudii ROUX 1907
Tropidurus occipitalis stolzmanni — MERTENS 1956
Ophryoessoides arenarius — ETHERIDGE 1966
Steironotus arenarius — FRITTS 1974: 51
Tropidurus arenarius — FRITTS 1974: 69
Tropidurus stolzmanni — DIXON & WRIGHT 1975: 34
Microlophus stolzmanni — FROST 1992
Tropidurus occipitalis stolzmanni — TIEDEMANN et al. 1994
Tropidurus arenarius — LEHR 2002: 203
Stenocercus arenarius — TORRES-CARVAJAL 2004
Microlophus stolzmanni — TORRES-CARVAJAL 2004
Tropidurus arenarius — TORRES-CARVAJAL 2005 (pers. comm.)
Microlophus arenarius — CARVALHO 2021 
DistributionPeru

Type locality: Huacho, north of Lima, Peru.

stolzmanni: N Peru; Type locality: “bei Chota”  
Reproductionoviparous; <br />stolzmanni: Females from 65 to 76 mm in snout-vent length contained 3 to 4 oviducal eggs. All oviducal eggs examined were shelled and apparently ready for deposition. One female 73 mm in snout-vent length contained 16 unyolked ovarian eggs. These lizards were taken between 23-28 November 1969 [DIXON & WRIGHT 1975]. 
TypesLectotype: MHNN 2275, designated by Carvalho 2021; the lectotype designated by Ortiz 1989 (NHMB 6035) is actually Stenocercus formosus, fide Carvalho, pers. comm., 11 July 2023.
Syntypes: NMW 18908: 1, 2 [stolzmanni] 
DiagnosisDiagnosis: Tropidurus stolzmanni is a member of the occipitalis group and differs from the other members of the group by lacking middorsal spots and by having chevron-shaped lines in the gular region, more prominent in males; differing also from occipitalis in lacking an occipital spot. Adult males of stolzmanni differ from males of both koepckeorum and occipitalis in having a broad, black-bordered, white stripe from the eye to near midbody [DIXON & WRIGHT 1975].

Fritts 1974: 52 provides a summary of characters of S. arenarius

Description (arenarius lectotype): “Adult male, body and limbs robust, SVL 120.15 mm; head triangular, length 28% of SVL and width 68% of head length; skull not compressed medially, not elevated at level of the orbits; scales of frontonasal region slightly tumescent, not imbricate posteriorly; rostral about three times as high as first supralabial in lateral view, not tumescent, contacting first supralabials, first lorilabials, right nasal, and three postrostrals; 2/1 postrostrals; nasal single, slightly higher than adjacent scales, separated from rostral by postrostral only on the left side; 6/6 enlarged supralabials followed by 4/3 smaller scales reaching the rictus oris, never contacting subocular; nostril oval/sub-reniform, occupying about 40% of nasal, positioned posteriorly, directed dorsolaterally, borders elevated posteriorly; 3/3 canthals; 5/6 enlarged, laminate superciliary scales; 1/1 dorsally keeled, subrectangular preoculars contacting 2/3 loreals; 1/1 dorsally keeled, elongate suboculars, separated from supralabials by lorilabials; palpebrals granular, second row formed by slightly tumescent, subconical scales, bearing a scale organ on top; 4/4 rows of supraoculars, anterior ones occupying less than one third of the width of the supraocular area, enlarged supraoculars occupying more than one third of the width of the supraocular area; 2/2 rows of angulate circumorbitals, smaller or about the same size of anteriormost supraocular scales; 1/1 rows of squarish or polygonal scales separating supraorbitals from superciliaries; 1/1 rows of short, laminate scales separating superciliaries from palpebrals likely present but not easily observable because ocular region is partially depressed due to wilting of the eyes; interparietal enlarged, several times larger than adjacent parietals and occipito‐parietals, squarish, slightly depressed antero‐medially; parietal eye not visible; one enlarged parietal on each side of interparietal, about 25% the size of interparietal; occipito‐parietals angulate, tumescent, subconical, slightly imbricate posteriorly, noticeably smaller than parietals; temporals keeled, slightly imbricate, about the same size or slightly smaller than occipito‐parietals and larger than lateral neck scales; two rows of occipitals separating interparietal from dorsals; ear with shape of inverted keyhole, canal noticeably deep, largest diameter of ear opening about 20% of ear opening to snout distance; preauricular fringe formed by at least 7/6 enlarged scales; mental extending posteriorly to the level of the first third of the adjacent infralabials; 6/6 enlarged infralabials followed by 4/3 small scales reaching the rictus oris; 4/4 enlarged postmentals; postmentals not in contact with infralabials; first postmentals not contacting one another; 11/10 sublabials in contact with enlarged infralabials; 44 gulars, imbricate posteriorly.
Vertebral crest present, tall, spine‐like scales extending through the tail (final third regenerated), vertebral spines relatively homogeneous in size; 60 vertebrals; 105 paravertebrals; 100 scale rows around midbody; 76 ventrals; dorsals large, keeled, imbricate, mucronate; scales on the armpit region small, smooth, non‐mucronate, growing in size and mucronation along the flanks; ventrals smooth, non‐mucronate, imbricate, slightly larger or about the same size as dorsals; supra‐carpals and supratarsals sub‐rhomboidal, anterior ones smooth, posterior ones keeled, some of them bearing a scale organ on the distal end of the scale; infra‐carpals keeled and infra‐tarsals smooth anteriorly and keeled towards fingers III and IV, mucronate; fingers and toes thin, cylindrical, slightly compressed laterally; supra‐digital lamellae subtriangular to sub‐rhomboidal, smooth; infra‐digital lamellae tricarinate, 23/23 under fourth finger, 30/32 under fourth toe, medial careen larger and more projected than lateral; ungual similar to subdigital lamellae; claws long or curved; preaxial scales of arm keeled, mucronate, grading into smooth scales on the ventral surface of the limb; preaxial and ventral scales of the leg smooth, slightly mucronate, post‐axial scales strongly keeled and mucronate, reducing in size towards the ventral surface; 28/28 tibial scales, keeled, strongly mucronate; dorsal body scales about the same size or slightly larger as scales on flanks, keeled, mucronate; rictal, nuchal and suprauricular folds absent; postauricular fold present, oblique neck fold well marked; antegular fold present, bearing a ventrolateral mite pocket on each side, coated with granular scales; gular fold present, incomplete medially, extending dorsally to form a well‐marked antehumeral fold; longitudinal fold present on the lateral body between post‐axillary region and midflank, supernumerary folds perpendicular to longitudinal fold present anteriorly, in the post‐axillary region; axillary and inguinal mite pockets absent; tail cylindrical, slightly compressed laterally; 56% of total length; caudal verticils absent; scales of tail up to three times larger than dorsals, imbricate, keeled, and mucronate dorsally, smooth and non‐mucronate ventrally; dorsal crest formed by serrate scales similar to those on dorsal body.” (Carvalho 2021: 43) 
CommentSynonymy: Carvalho 2021 synonymized stolzmanni with arenarius, although he did not examine the types. His conclusion is based on the description by Steindachner and others

Habitat. The majority of specimens were found on or near small boulders, trees, and shrubs. Several were found under debris associated with abandoned human dwellings. Most were found in habitats with some kind of vegetation, such as mesquite, acacia, Capparis scabrida, dense beach shrubs or semiarid woodlands of the foothill slopes. This species is primarily scansorial; most specimens were taken one to three dm above the ground on trees. However, some were taken on the ground in the vicinity of shrubs where they appeared to be foraging for food [DIXON & WRIGHT 1975 on M. stolzmanni].

NCBI taxonID: 179259 [stolzmanni] 
References
  • Bauer, A.M.; Günther,R. & Klipfel,M. 1995. The herpetological contributions of Wilhelm C.H. Peters (1815-1883). SSAR Facsimile Reprints in Herpetology, 714 pp.
  • Boulenger, G.A. 1885. Catalogue of the lizards in the British Museum (Natural History). Vol. 2, Second edition. London, xiii+497 pp. - get paper here
  • Boulenger, George A. 1901. Further descriptions of new reptiles collected by Mr. P. O. Simons in Peru and Bolivia. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (7) 7 (42): 546-549 - get paper here
  • Carvalho, André L.G. 2021. Resolving the Obscure Identity of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and Tropidurus tschudii Roux, 1907 (Squamata: Tropiduridae). South American Journal of Herpetology 19(1), 40-53 - get paper here
  • Cuadrado SS, Loor YA, Narváez AE 2020. Herpetofauna of Engabao, Playas Canton, Ecuador, with notes on the occurrence of Ceratoprhys stolzmanni (Steindachner, 1882). Check List 16(3): 665-674 - get paper here
  • Dixon, J.R. & WRIGHT,J.W. 1975. A review of the lizards of the iguanid genus Tropidurus in Peru. Contributions in Science (Los Angeles) (271): 1-39 - get paper here
  • Etheridge, Richard E. 1966. The systematic relationships of West Indian and South American lizards referred to the iguanid genus Leiocephalus. Copeia 1966 (1): 79-91 - get paper here
  • Fritts, Thomas H. 1974. A multivariate evolutionary analysis of the Andean Iguanid lizards of the genus Stenocercus. San Diego Society of Natural History Memoir 7: 1-89 - get paper here
  • Goldberg, S.R. & Bursey, C.R. 2009. Helminths from seven species of Microlophus (Squamata: Tropiduridae). Salamandra 45 (2): 125-128 - get paper here
  • HARVEY, Michael B. & RONALD L. GUTBERLET JR 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of the tropidurine lizards (Squamata: Tropiduridae), including new characters of squamation and epidermal microstructure. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 189–233. - get paper here
  • Koch, C. 2010. Geheimnisvolles Peru. Reptilia (Münster) 15 (82): 36-45 - get paper here
  • Lehr, E. 2002. Amphibien und Reptilien in Peru. Natur und Tier-Verlag (Münster), 208 pp. - get paper here
  • Müller, L. 1924. Ueber neue oder seltene Mittel- und Südamerikanische Amphibien und Reptilien. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 11 (1): 75-93 [1923]
  • Peters, Wilhem Carl Hartwig. 1871. Über einige Arten der herpetologischen Sammlung des Berliner zoologischen Museums. Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1871: 644-652 - get paper here
  • Schlüter, U. 2000. Wüstenkielschwanzleguane aus Peru. Draco 1 (4): 44-49
  • Torres-Carvajal O, Pazmiño-Otamendi G, Salazar-Valenzuela D. 2019. Reptiles of Ecuador: a resource-rich portal, with a dynamic checklist and photographic guides. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 13 (1): [General Section]: 209–229 (e178) - get paper here
  • Torres-Carvajal, O. 2004. Herpetofauna of Isla de La Plata, Ecuador. Herpetological Review 35 (1): 85 - get paper here
  • Torres-Carvajal, O. 2004. The abdominal skeleton of Tropidurid lizards (Squamata: Tropiduridae). Herpetologica 60 (1): 75-83 - get paper here
  • Toyama, Ken Sebastian 2016. Evidence of adaptive evolution in the cranial morphology of Tropidurid lizards from coastal Peru. Herpetology Notes 9: 47-53 - get paper here
  • Tschudi,J. J. von 1845. Reptilium conspectum quae in republica Peruana reperiuntur er pleraque observata vel collecta sunt in itenere. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 11 (1): 150-170 [reprint 1968, SSAR; sometimes cited as being published in 1846]. - get paper here
  • Watkins, G. W. 1996. Proximate causes of sexual size dimorphism in the iguanian lizard Microlophus occipitalis. Ecology 77: 1473-1482 - get paper here
  • Watkins, Graham G. 1998. Function of a secondary sexual ornament: the crest in the South American Iguanian lizard Microlophus occipitalis (Peters, Tropiduridae). Herpetologica 54 (2): 161-169 - get paper here
  • Werner, FRANZ 1901. Reptilien und Batrachier aus Peru und Bolivien. Abhandl. Ber. Zool. Anthrop. Mus. Dresden, 9 (2): 1-14 [1900] - get paper here
 
External links  
Is it interesting? Share with others:


Please submit feedback about this entry to the curator