Pseudoindotyphlops exiguus (JAN, 1864)
We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search:
Higher Taxa | Typhlopidae (Asiatyphlopinae), Typhlopoidea, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes) |
Subspecies | |
Common Names | E: Belgaum Worm Snake |
Synonym | Typhlops exiguus JAN, in JAN & SORDELLI 1864 Typhlops exiguus — BOULENGER 1893: 31 Typhlops exignus WERNER 1921: 332 (error typographicus) Typhlops exiguus — MCDIARMID, CAMPBELL & TOURÉ 1999: 101 Typhlops exiguus — DAS 2003 Typhlops exiguus — WALLACH et al. 2014: 762 Indotyphlops exiguus — HEDGES et al. 2014 Pseudoindotyphlops exiguus — SIDHARTHAN et al. 2024: 6 |
Distribution | India (Belgaum, Karnataka State, south-western India) Type locality: “East lndies” ["Indes Orientales"] |
Reproduction | oviparous |
Types | Holotype: SMNS 2473, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany |
Diagnosis | Diagnosis (Pseudoindotyphlops): Pseudoindotyphlops gen. nov. can be distinguished from the co-distributed Indotyphlops species by a T-III/V (T-III on one side and T-V on the other) or T-V supralabial imbrication pattern and the following combination of characters: small to moderate-sized (total length 65–285 mm), slender-bodied (length/width ratio 65–88) snakes with 18 scale rows (with reduction in P. porrectus), transverse scale rows between 412 and 444, tail short (1.4–2.3% of total length) with 7–12 subcaudals and length/ width ratio between 1.0 and 2.0. Dorsal and lateral head profiles rounded, narrow to moderate rostral (0.25–0.50 head width), inferior nasal suture in contact with supralabial scales 1 and/or 2, with a single postocular. (SIDHARTHAN et al. 2024) Additional details (118 characters) are available for collaborators and contributors. Please contact us for details. |
Comment | The plate carrying the illustration of Typhlops exiguus appeared in April, 1864, while the description appeared in October, 1864. Type species: Typhlops exiguus JAN, in JAN & SORDELLI 1864 is the type species of the genus Pseudoindotyphlops SIDHARTHAN et al. 2024. Based on the tree in SIDHARTHAN et al. 2024, the new genus seems justified, but node support is not high, hence a tree that groups Pseudoindotyphlops with Indotyphlops cannot be rejected. Thus "demonstrated polyphyly" is not correct. Moreover, the morphological characters don't support their new genus (with input from Blair Hedges, pers. comm., 29 March 2024). |
Etymology | Named for Latin “exiguus” = insignificant. The genus Pseudoindotyphlops refers to the morphological and distributional similarity with Indotyphlops, with the Latin adjective pseudo (meaning ‘false’) in the prefix referring to the molecular dissimilarity that distinguishes it from Indotyphlops. |
References |
|
External links |