Rhinophis zigzag GOWER & MADUWAGE, 2011

We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search:

Higher Taxa	Uropeltidae, Henophidia, Alethinophidia, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes)
Subspecies
Common Names	E: Zigzag Rhinophis
Synonym	Rhinophis zigzag GOWER & MADUWAGE 2011 Rhinophis dorsimaculatus — DERANIYAGALA 1941 Rhinophis dorsimaculatus — SOMAWEERA 2006: 235, photo A Rhinophis sp. 2 — CADLE et al. 1990 Rhinophis zigzag — WALLACH et al. 2014: 652
Distribution	Sri Lanka Type locality: “Bibilegema Rd.”, near Passara, Province of Uva. There are no precise coordinates for the locality, though Bibilegama is at 06°54’N, 81°08’ E and approximately 1,000 m elevation.
Reproduction	viviparous (not imputed, fide Zimin et al. 2022)
Types	Holotype: CAS 226306, male, collected May 1974 by C. Gans.
Diagnosis	Diagnosis: In having more than 200 ventral scales, R. zigzag (207–221) differs from all other Rhinophis except R. dorsimaculatus, R. oxyrhynchus, R. punctatus, R. porrectus, R. homolepis, and R. sanguineus. Of these six species, R. punctatus, R. porrectus, and R. dorsimaculatus have more than 230 ventrals whereas R. zigzag has fewer than 230, and the former three species plus R. oxyrhynchus have a dorsally crested/carinate rostral scale vs the dorsally rounded rostral of R. zigzag. Rhinophis homolepis has a notably smaller head and its tail shield lacks the heterogeneity in the size of the spines seen in R. zigzag. Rhinophis sanguineus also lacks notable spine heterogeneity on the tail shield, and differs from R. zigzag also in having a much larger shield, conspicuous (but low) multiple carinae on the distal edges of scales on the underside of the tail, and in having a shorter rostral that barely interjects between the prefrontal scales. Rhinophis zigzag also differs from all congeners in its distinctive and consistent colour pattern of a dark middorsal, meandering/zigzag stripe.
Comment
Etymology	The species name is an allusion to the distinctive zigzag dorsal stripe, present in all known specimens. The specific epithet is considered a noun in apposition.
References	Gower, D.J. & Mduwage, K. 2011. Two new species of Rhinophis Hemprich (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from Sri Lanka. Zootaxa 2881: 51–68 - get paper here Pyron R. A., Ganesh S. R., Sayyed A., Sharma V., Wallach V. & Somaweera R. 2016. A catalogue and systematic overview of the shield-tailed snakes (Serpentes: Uropeltidae). [type catalogue] Zoosystema 38 (4): 453-506 - get paper here Wallach, Van; Kenneth L. Williams , Jeff Boundy 2014. Snakes of the World: A Catalogue of Living and Extinct Species. [type catalogue] Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 1237 pp. Zimin, A., Zimin, S. V., Shine, R., Avila, L., Bauer, A., Böhm, M., Brown, R., Barki, G., de Oliveira Caetano, G. H., Castro Herrera, F., Chapple, D. G., Chirio, L., Colli, G. R., Doan, T. M., Glaw, F., Grismer, L. L., Itescu, Y., Kraus, F., LeBreton 2022. A global analysis of viviparity in squamates highlights its prevalence in cold climates. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 00, 1–16 - get paper here
External links	IUCN Red List National Center for Biotechnology Information https://www.facebook.com/groups/stshc/posts/559765672914702/ Google images

Is it interesting? Share with others:

Please submit feedback about this entry to the curator