Ristella rurkii GRAY, 1839
Find more photos by Google images search:
Higher Taxa | Scincidae, Ristellinae (Ristellini), Scincoidea, Sauria, Squamata (lizards) |
Subspecies | |
Common Names | E: Rurk's Ristella, Burke’s Catskink |
Synonym | Ristella rurkii GRAY 1839: 333 Ateuchosaurus travancoricus BEDDOME 1870: 33 (part.) Ristella travancorica — BEDDOME 1871 Ristella malabarica STOLICZKA 1871: 195 Ristella rurkii — BOULENGER 1887: 357 Ristella rurkii — HORA 1927: 6 Ristella rurki — SMITH 1935: 331 Ristella rurkii — DAS 1996: 48 Ristella rurkii — GANESH — 2018 |
Distribution | India (Anaimalai Hills, Travancore and Palni Hills, Kerala) |
Reproduction | oviparous (not imputed, fide Zimin et al. 2022) |
Types | Neotype: BMNH 1946.8.15.67, designated by Shea (2025). The holotype is now lost, formerly FPM; types on BMNH online catalogue listed as BMNH 1946.8.15.64-68. |
Diagnosis | Unfortunately we had to temporarily remove additional information as this was scraped by multiple AI companies who sell that data to their customers. These details, e.g. detailed descriptions or comparisons (about 1745 characters), are available for collaborators and contributors. Please contact us for details. |
Comment | Type species: Ristella rurkii GRAY 1839: 333 is the type species of the genus Ristella GRAY 1839. Ristella is also the type genus of the family Ristellidae Hedges & Conn 2012: 28 and of the tribus Ristellini Hedges 2014 (fide Shea 2021). Phylogenetics: for a phylogenetic analysis of the position of Ristella see Ghosh et al. 2023. Abundance: Rare. This is one of the species called 'lost' and 'rediscovered' by Lindken et al. 2024. Reference images: see Uetz et al. 2024 for high-resolution reference images for this species. |
Etymology | Named after “Dr. Rurk”, who sent the holotype of this Indian skink to Gray. However, Shea (2025) argued that the species was likely named after Dr William Augustus Burke, the first Inspector-General of Hospitals in India, The origin of the genus name remains unclear as it was not explicitly stated by Gray (1856), but likely to be a euphonious but meaningless combination of letters, as with many of Gray's generic names. |
References |
|
External links |