Toxicocalamus atratus KRAUS, KAISER & O'SHEA, 2022
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Toxicocalamus atratus?
We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search:
|Higher Taxa||Elapidae (Hydrophiinae), Colubroidea, Caenophidia, Alethinophidia, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes)|
|Common Names||E: Black forest snake|
|Synonym||Toxicocalamus atratus KRAUS, KAISER & O'SHEA 2022: 1025|
|Distribution||Papua New Guinea (Central Highlands of Papua New Guinea and extending as far east as the southern side of the Ekuti Dividing Range, Morobe Province, at elevations of 840–2140 m)|
Type locality: Kundiawa, 6.02°S, 144.97°E, elevation 1585 m, Chimbu Province, Papua New Guinea
|Types||Holotype. MCZ R-84144, an adult female collected by Fred Parker on 25 May 1964.|
Paratypes (n = 90). Papua New Guinea: Chimbu Prov- ince: along Wahgi River, 5.94°S, 144.80°E, elev. 1470 m, CAS 113665, 139564; Karimui, 6.50°S, 144.83°E, elev. 1170 m, CAS 118961–62; Kondiu, 5.98°S, 144.87°E, elev. 1600 m, AMNH R-75336–57; Kundiawa, 6.02°S, 144.97°E, elev. 1585 m, AMNH R-98495, R-98497, CAS 99916, 100069, 113670, 115986, 118948, 118960, 139584, 140043, MCZ R-83218, R-84026, R-111767, R-111788, R-115586, R-116774, R-116788, R-140818, R-145923, NMV 13421, USNM 166280; Kup, 5.95°S, 144.80°E, elev. 1500 m, AMNH R-72780–81; Mintima, 5.98°S, 144.91°E, elev. 1770 m, CAS 103374–75, 113663, 118957–59, MCZ R-116789–90, R-121547–48; Noru, 6.60°S, 144.63°E, elev. 1770 m, AMS R115365; Eastern Highlands Province: Agakamatasa, 6.72°S, 145.62°E, elev. 1720 m, MCZ R-121545; Lida Patrol Post, 6.32°S, 145.40°E, elev. 1800 m, CAS 139575; Lufa, Mt. Michael, 6.33°S, 145.25°E, elev. 1120 m, CAS 113666–67, MCZ R-121546; Nivi Unggai, 6.21°S, 145.31°E, elev. 2030 m, MCZ R-84142, R-116791–92; Hela Province: Bobole, 6.23°S, 142.77°E, elev. 1145 m, AMS R122803, R122806; Halalinja, 6.15°S, 143.37°E, elev. 2140 m, BMNH 1976.92; Nipa, 6.10°S, 143.25°E, elev. 2070 m, UPNG 5811; Jiwaka Province: Banz, 5.78°S, 144.62°E, elev. 1650 m, AMNH R-85743, R-88060; Minj, 5.86°S, 144.87°E, elev. 1560 m, MCZ R-141849; Morobe Province: Kwaplalim, 12–13 km W Menyamya, 7.19°S, 145.97°E, elev. 1490 m, NMW 37670, UCM 51552–53; Southern Highlands Province: Mendi, 6.14°S, 143.66°E, elev. 1750 m, CAS 113664, MCZ R-121543–44; Moro Camp, Lake Kutubu, 6.36°S, 143.23°E, elev. 840 m, SAMA R69950; Western Highlands Province: Igindi, 6.19°S, 144.98°E, elev. 1630 m, AMNH R-98134; Kimil, 5.72°S, 144.53°E, elev. 1700 m, AMNH R-14783; Korn, Mt. Hagen, 5.84°S, 144.31°E, elev. 1630 m, AMNH R-14771, R-14773, R-14785–88.
|Diagnosis||Diagnosis. “A large member of the T. loriae Group (male SVL up to 655 mm, female SVL up to 682 mm) with the following unique combination of characters: sexual size dimorphism in SVL present (t71 = 2.5689, p = 0.0062); two scales covering vent; posterior genials usually entirely separated (80%) but may be in anterior contact (20%) with each other; intergenial usually widest posteriorly (89%) or centrally (11%); preocular usually contacting nasal (77%), not contacting internasal; preocular rather short, less than twice as long as deep; postoculars two (one in 26%); posterior temporals two (58%) or three (42%); ventrals sexually dimorphic (t85 = 7.400, p < 0.00001), 177–206 in males, 187–218 in females; subcaudals sexually dimorphic with overlap (t87 = –24.8814, p < 0.00001), 40–47 in males, 26–41 in females; two scales covering vent; yellow nuchal collar and yellow markings on prefrontals present in juveniles, usually absent (but sometimes merely faded) in adults; tail spine paler than remainder of tail; and venter uniformly dark brown or dark brown with the posterior of each ventral paler brown or yellowish brown in adults, giving a banded appearance, black in life; venter yellow with a black spot on lateral margins of each ventral in juveniles.” (Kraus et al. 2022)|
Comparisons. “Adult Toxicocalamus atratus is easily distinguished from all other members of the T. loriae species group except T. nymani in having a dark venter that is black or very dark brown in life and either uniformly brown or with each ventral banded dark brown in preservative. Other members of this complex have venters that are yellow (T. lamingtoni, T. loennbergii, T. loriae, T. spilorhynchus, T. vertebralis), grey (T. nigrescens), or yellow or pale grey with grey bands across each ventral (T. mattisoni). Toxicocalamus atratus can be distinguished from T. nymani by its juvenile ventral colour pattern (pale yellow with a black spot on the lateral edges of each ventral vs. uniformly black or dark brown but banded with dark brown in preservative in T. nymani), larger size (males to 655 mm SVL, females to 682 mm SVL vs. 422 mm and 540 mm, respectively, in T. nymani), and the greater number of ventrals with overlap in both sexes (males 177–206 vs. 178–198 in T. nymani; t65 = 5.0261, p < 0.00001; females: 187–218 vs. 191–210 in T. nymani, t62 = 4.3472, p = 0.000026). Although the venter of T. atratus is much darker, its banded pattern in most preserved specimens could perhaps be mistaken for the paler banded pattern seen in preserved T. nigrescens and T. mattisoni. Toxicocalamus atratus can be further distinguished from T. nigrescens in having a shorter preocular (preocular approximately squarish, slightly longer than tall in T. atratus vs. more than twice as long as tall in T. nigrescens), and from T. mattisoni in having the preocular usually contacting nasal (vs. never in T. mattisoni) and usually two postoculars (vs. one in T. mattisoni).” (Kraus et al. 2022)
Description of the holotype. “Adult female, 590 mm SVL + 72 mm TL = 662 mm TTL. Rostral broader than high, notched ventromedially; internasals angulate, semi- triangular, wider than long; prefrontals distinct from preoculars, approximately square but angled laterally and posteriorly, slightly wider than long (Fig. 14A, A’), bordered below by preocular and nasal; preoculars angulate, slightly longer than high, bordered anteriorly by nasal, below by second and third supralabials (Fig. 14B, B’, C, C’); frontal shield-shaped, lateral margins straight, not fused with supraoculars, anterior margin extending slightly anterior to remainder of scale medially; parietals approximately twice as long as wide. Nasals divided by large nares, with a short groove above and below along the posterior of naris. Postoculars single on each side, irregularly pentagonal in shape; one elongate anterior temporal above fifth and sixth supralabials, separating latter from parietal; two posterior temporals, subequal in size, lower abutting posterodorsal margin of sixth supralabial. Supralabials six on each side, third and fourth entering eye; infralabials six, first three in contact with anterior genial. Mental small, shallow, triangular, wider than deep, bordered behind by first supralabials; anterior genials slightly larger than posterior genials, in medial contact along entire length; posterior genials longer on left than right, completely separated by single elongate intergenial, which is widest posteriorly; seven gulars separate intergenial from first ventral in the midline; first sublabial separates posterior genial from fifth infralabial (Fig. 14D, D’). Eye relatively small; pupil round.
Dorsal scale rows 15-15-15, smooth, not notched posteriorly, without apical pits. Ventrals 207, each approximately four times wider than long; two scales covering vent; subcaudals 30, paired. Tail tipped by a pointed conical spine.
In preservative (50 years after collection), dorsum dark brown dorsally, slightly paler laterally (Fig. 15A). Venter dark brown, anterior ventrals dark brown, narrowly margined with paler brown posteriorly (Fig. 15B), subcaudals dark brown. Supralabials yellow, dark brown on approximately dorsal half of each scale. Head dark brown with vague yellow blotch on each prefrontal just extending onto posterolateral corner of each internasal. No pale nuchal collar present. Chin and throat with pale straw yellow ground heavily suffused with brown throughout, imparting a largely brown impression overall. Tail spine white. Iris black.” (Kraus et al. 2022)
Variation. “Preoculars contact nasals in most specimens but are separated by prefrontal contact with the second supralabial on both sides in 17 specimens and on one side in nine specimens; preoculars are invariably separated from contact with internasals. Postoculars one (25.5%) or two (74%), absent on left side of MCZ R-141849. Posterior temporals two (58%) or three (42%). Supralabials six, except five on right side of AMS R14788, CAS 118948, and MCZ R-84142, the left side of MCZ R-116790, and both sides of CAS 115986, 118962, and MCZ R-141849; third and fourth supralabials contacting eye, except third through fifth on right side of AMNH R-75344, and only third supralabial on right side of AMS R14788, CAS 118962, and MCZ R-84142. Infralabials invariably six. Posterior genials in small anterior contact (20% of specimens) or entirely separated (80%) by single intergenial (two small intergenials in AMNH R-72780– 81 from Kup). Intergenials widest posteriorly (89% of specimens) but widest centrally in ten (11%).
Dorsal scale rows invariably 15-15-15. Ventrals 177–206 (196 ± 5) in 49 males, 187–218 (206 ± 7) in 43 females; subcaudals 40–47 (44 ± 2) in 48 males, 26–41 (31 ± 3) in 41 females. SCR 16.9–21.0% (18.3 ± 0.8%) in 48 males, 11.2–17.8% (12.9 ± 1.3%) in 41 females. Tail tipped by a blunt to pointed conical spine. Maximum male SVL = 655 mm, TLR in 38 adult males 12.9–19.4% (15.5 ± 1.7%); maximum female SVL = 682 mm, TLR in 33 adult females 6.7–18.7% (10.2 ± 2.2%); sexual size dimorphism present (t71 = 2.5689, p = 0.0062). There appears to be an ontogenetic effect of tail length in juvenile males, whose tails are relatively shorter (mean TLR 12.5 ± 0.6; n = 10) than those of adult males (mean TLR 15.6 ± 1.7; n = 39). This difference is not present in females (mean TLR in eight juveniles 10.4 ± 1.4, in 32 adults 9.9 ± 1.7). The vent is typically covered by two scales, but this covering is incompletely formed in AMNH R-75355 and covered by a single scale in CAS 103774–75 and 139584.
Variation in colouration is largely ontogenetic, with adults being black or dark brown above and below, although these colours fade to brown in preservative, and often with each ventral appearing banded with dark and light brown as colouration fades in preservative. Small juveniles (SVL = 161–262 mm) are often paler than this, with a dark vertebral stripe often being present, but this seems to be lost as animals darken ontogenetically. Small juveniles also have a large yellow blotch on each prefrontal and an incomplete yellow nuchal collar whose sides are separated by two to four brown dorsal scale rows(Fig.4M,N,16).Thesemarkingsusuallydisappear in adults but may be retained as vague markings. Furthermore, small juveniles have a yellow venter with each ventral marked on each lateral extremity with a black spot. Because the first row of dorsal scales is also yellow or pale brown, this imparts the impression of the venter having a row of black spots along each side. In a few small specimens (CAS 103374, 113666, MCZ R-116774), these yellow venters also have a few small brown flecks. The tail spine is white in most specimens but pale brown in two.” (Kraus et al. 2022)
Colour in life. “Photographs of MCZ R-84026 (540 mm SVL) and R-111767 (480 mm SVL), both adult males, show uniformly black animals, with the venter of the latter also being black (Fig. 11E, F). Photographs provided to us by Nick Baker of an uncollected juvenile from Southern Highlands Province, PNG, show an animal with a black dorsum (Fig. 16A), yellow venter having a mid-ventral row of brown spots (Fig. 16B, C), and yellow supralabials, a yellow spot on each prefrontal, and a very incomplete nuchal collar consisting of only two small yellow lateral spots (Fig. 16C, D).
Fred Parker, the collector, took numerous field notes on this species in life. Colour patterns for adults were described by him as follows: “Black with pair of yellow spots on the snout, partial bars laterally on back of head.” (MCZ R-121547, SVL = 360 mm); “Part grown, black above and below.” (CAS 139564, SVL=455 mm); “Olive-black above, a narrow darker vertebral line from behind head to tip of tail. Lips translucent pinkish marked grey. Ventrals greyish, paler than dorsum.” (MCZ R-84142, SVL = 470 mm); “Uniform iridescent black on dorsal surfaces. Ventrally and laterally uniform black with no markings. Lips faintly yellowish. Spike on tail yellow with black tip.” (MCZ R-84026, SVL = 540 mm). “Black above, brown laterally. Grey-brown underneath. Lips paler.” (CAS 99916, SVL = 610 mm). “Black above and below. Head slightly paler with olive tinge. Highly iridescent.” (AMNH R-98495, SVL = 515 mm).
He described the colour pattern for two juveniles as follows: “A juvenile with bright yellow bar across snout and short similar bars laterally on back of head from behind corner of jaw to posterior corners of large head shields but not meeting dorsally. Ventrally, translucent yellow, with a black spot at side of each ventral [scale]. Tail with yellow spike at tip, the spike with small brown tip. Whole of upper lips yellow. Some greyish markings under the head. A narrow dark vertebral stripe. Flanks paler than dorsum. Pair of anals marked grey.” (MCZ R-83218, SVL = 211 mm); “Grey-brown above, whitish below, yellow bar on snout, lips yellow, part bars laterally at back of head.” (AMNH R-98498, SVL = 299 mm). Finally, a neonate that hatched on 23 December 1964 was recorded as black above, translucent below, and with paler lips; we have been unable to locate this specimen in any museum catalogue.” (Kraus et al. 2022)
|Etymology||Named after the Latin adjective meaning “dressed in black,” in recognition of the dark dorsal and ventral colouration of adults of this species.|
Is it interesting? Share with others:
As link to this species use URL address:
without field 'search_param'. Field 'search_param' is used for browsing search result.