Uma inornata COPE, 1895
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Uma inornata?
|Higher Taxa||Phrynosomatidae, Phrynosomatinae, Callisaurini; Iguania, Sauria (lizards)|
|Common Names||Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard|
|Synonym||Uma notata inornata COPE 1895: 939|
Uma inornata — STEBBINS 1985: 119
Uma inornata — CROTHER 2000: 54
Uma inornata — COLLINS & TAGGART 2009
|Distribution||USA (SE California: Coachella Valley, Riverside County)|
Type locality: "Colorado Desert, San Diego County, California" (in errore, doubtless from Riverside County, California fide HEIFETZ 1941). Map legend:
- Region according to the TDWG standard, not a precise distribution map.
NOTE: TDWG regions are generated automatically from the text in the distribution field and not in every cases it works well. We are working on it.
|Types||Type: lost (fide HEIFETZ 1941), collected by C.R. Orcutt.|
|Comment||Status unclear. Not listed by Collins 1997. Trépanier & Murphy (2001) found that the preferred phylogeny had two primary clades: one consisting of U. scoparia and the other placing U. inornata inside the clade containing U. notata. Uma inornata was most closely related to nearby U. notata notata, as opposed to more distant U. notata rufopunctata.|
DIAGNOSIS. Abdomen immaculate. Similar to U. n. notata in all other characters. Gular markings like those of U. n. notata; usually three internasal rows; femoral pores 18 to 28; fringe scales on fourth toe 25 to 36; no reddish brown in dorsal pattern; dorsal ocelli arranged in semilineate pattern as in U. n. notata (from HEIFETZ 1941).