Hemiergis gracilipes (STEINDACHNER, 1870)
Find more photos by Google images search: ![]()
| Higher Taxa | Scincidae, Sphenomorphinae (Sphenomorphini), Scincoidea, Sauria, Squamata (lizards) |
| Subspecies | |
| Common Names | E: South-western Mulch-skink |
| Synonym | Hinulia gracilipes STEINDACHNER 1870: 342 Lygosoma australis GRAY 1839: 332 (non Tiliqua australis GRAY 1838) Sphenomorphus gracilipes — COGGER 1983: 184 Glaphyromorphus australis — STORR et al. 1999 Glaphyromorphus gracilipes — COGGER 2000: 495 Glaphyromorphus gracilipes — COUPER et al. 2006: 381 Hemiergis gracilipes — MECKE et al. 2009 Hemiergis gracilipes — REEDER & REICHERT 2011 Hemiergis gracilipes — DUNAYEV 2025 |
| Distribution | Australia (Western Australia) Type locality: Rockhampton. australis: neotype locality: Albany, W. A., designated by Storr (1967). Original type locality "Australia”. |
| Reproduction | ovoviviparous |
| Types | Syntypes: NMW (= NHMW) 10140, 10141:1-2, donated Steindachner, 1870 (Tiedemann et al., 1994). Fourth syntype not found (Cogger et al. 1983). Neotype: WAM R24980, designated by Storr 1967 [australis] |
| Diagnosis | Unfortunately we had to temporarily remove additional information as this was scraped by multiple AI companies who sell that data. These details, e.g. detailed descriptions are available for collaborators and contributors. Please contact us if you need any of this material. |
| Comment | Synonymy after COGGER 1983. Tiliqua australis Gray, 1838 and Lygosoma australis Gray, 1839, were both placed in the genus Lygosoma by Boulenger (1887), who erroneously treated Tiliqua australis as the junior secondary homonym. While it can be argued that Lygosoma australis has never been formally rejected as a junior homonym and therefore is available and has priority over Hinulia gracilipes Steindachner, 1870, under Article 59 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature we have arbitrarily treated Lygosoma australis Gray, 1839 as a junior secondary homonym of Tiliqua australis Gray, 1838, rejected prior to 1961 (see Loveridge 1934) [fide COGGER 1983: 184]. Limb morphology: 5 digits, 5 toes (Singhal et al. 2018, Brandley et al 2008) |
| Etymology | Presumably named after the Latin gracilis (slender) plus pes (foot), referring to the slender, long-toed feet of this elongate skink. (G. Shea, pers. comm., 9 Feb 2024) |
| References |
|
| External links |
