Acanthodactylus zagrosicus MOZAFFARI, MOHAMMADI, SABERI-PIROOZ & AHMADZADEH, 2021
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Acanthodactylus zagrosicus?
Acanthodactylus zagrosicus
We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search: 
| Higher Taxa | Lacertidae, Eremiadinae, Sauria, Lacertoidea, Squamata (lizards) |
| Subspecies | |
| Common Names | E: Zagrosian Fringe-fingered lizard |
| Synonym | Acanthodactylus zagrosicus MOZAFFARI, MOHAMMADI, SABERI-PIROOZ & AHMADZADEH 2021 Acanthodactylus boskianus — RASTEGAR-POUYANI 1999 Acanthodactylus boskianus — HEIDARI et al. 2014 Acanthodactylus boskianus — ŠMID et al. 2014 Acanthodactylus boskianus — MOZAFFARI et al. 2014 |
| Distribution | Iran (Khuzestan) Type locality: roadside from Gotvand to Saland (around 60 km east of Dezful city, Khuzestan Province, Iran), 32° 26 ́ 51.54 ̋ N, 48° 52 ́ 26.64 ̋ E at an elevation of 460 m a.s.l. |
| Reproduction | |
| Types | Holotype. ZFMK103173. Adult male. Collected on April 2005 by Omid Mozaffari. Paratype. ZFMK103174. Adult female. Collection details as the holotype. |
| Diagnosis | Diagnosis: A medium to large size Acanthodactylus species with: 1) three rows of scales around 4th toe; 2) ventral plates in 10 longitudinal rows across belly; 3) four supraoculars, the last one is sometimes divided; 4) smooth temporal and supratemporal scales; 5) strong keel on dorsal and upper caudal scales; 6) a single large and sharply keeled subocular scale; 7) subocular scale in contact with mouth or supralabials; 8) large ear opening with anterior denticulation; 9) 43–50 mid-dorsum scales; 10) 25–30 transverse scales in ventral. Comparisons. Acanthodactylus zagrosicus sp. nov. can be differentiated from most species of the Western and scutellatus clades of Acanthodactylus due to their North African distribution. It can be distinguished from species of the Eastern clade and from those geographically close to or from Iran, as follows: from species of blanfordii group (A. blanfordii and A. schmidti), cantoris group (A. arabicus Boulenger, 1918, A. cantoris, A. gongrorhynchatus Leviton & Anderson, 1967, A. haasi Leviton & Anderson, 1967 and A. tilburyi Arnold, 1986) and A. hardyi by having three rows of scales on fingers (vs. four), smooth temporal scales (instead of keeled temporal scales) and 10 straight longitudinal rows of ventral scales (vs. 12 or more). It is further distinguished from A. gongrorhynchatus by having large ear opening (instead of almost closed off by two or three scales on the anterior portion). It can be differentiated from A. grandis by having strongly keeled dorsal scales (instead of smooth or weakly keeled), 10 straight longitudinal rows of ventral scales (vs. 14–16) and three rows of scales on fingers (instead of four). Acanthodactylus zagrosicus sp. nov. can be excluded from species of the tristrami group (A. tristrami (Günther, 1864) and A. robustus Werner, 1929) by having strongly keeled upper caudal and dorsal scales (instead of smooth scales on upper caudal and dorsal), having four supraocular scales (vs. two or three) and anterior denticulation in ear opening that is not present in the tristrami group’s species. This new species can be excluded from members of micropholis group (A. micropholis and A. khamirensis) by having less mid-dorsum scales (43–50 vs. 50–63 in A. micropholis and 56–64 in A. khamirensis) and having four supraocular scales (vs. two or three). In addition, it also can be distinguished from A. micropholis by having strongly keeled dorsal scales (instead of smooth or feebly keeled), and from A. khamirensis by having less rows or transverse scales in ventral (25–30 vs. 32–39). Among the members of the opheodurus group, it can be differentiated from A. felicis Arnold, 1980 by having less transverse ventral scales (25–30 vs. 36–42), more straight longitudinal rows of ventral scales (10 vs. 8), smooth supratemporal scales (instead of keeled supratemporals), and it can be distinguished from A. opheodurus Arnold, 1980 by having smooth temporal scales (instead of sharply keeled temporal scales), smooth supratemporal scales (instead of very conspicuous longitudinal central keel on supratemporal), and by having less transverse ventral scales (25–30 vs. 29–36). Regarding to its morphological characters, Acanthodactylus zagrosicus sp. nov. is similar to members of the boskianus group along with A. boskianus, A. nilsoni, and A. schreiberi. This species can be distinguished from other species of this group by smooth temporal scales and lacking longitudinal central keel on supratemporals (instead of sharply keeled temporal scales). Moreover, Acanthodactylus zagrosicus sp. nov. can be differentiated from A. nilsoni by having strongly keeled dorsal scales (instead of weakly keeled dorsal scales), less collar scales (8–9 vs. 10–12), and more longitudinal rows of ventral scales (10 vs. 8). It can be distinguished from A. schreiberi by having strongly keeled dorsal scales (instead of smooth dorsal scales) and less gular scales (25–30 vs. 31–36). |
| Comment | |
| Etymology | Acanthodactylus is a combination of two Greek word; “akanthodis” meaning thorny and “dachtylo” meaning finger. The words together refer to lateral fringes on hindlimb fingers. The epithet zagrosicus refers to the Zagros Mountains in western Iran, the known habitat of this species. |
| References |
|
| External links |