You are here » home advanced search Dipsas oligozonata

Dipsas oligozonata (ORCÉS & ALMENDÁRIZ, 1989)

IUCN Red List - Dipsas oligozonata - Vulnerable, VU

Can you confirm these amateur observations of Dipsas oligozonata?

Add your own observation of
Dipsas oligozonata »

We have no photos, try to find some by Google images search: Google images

Higher TaxaColubridae (Dipsadinae), Colubroidea, Caenophidia, Alethinophidia, Serpentes, Squamata (snakes)
Subspecies 
Common Names 
SynonymSibynomorphus oligozonatus ORCÉS & ALMENDÁRIZ 1989
Sibynomorphus oligozonatus — CADLE 2007: 191
Sibynomorphus oligozonatus — WALLACH et al. 2014: 670
Dipsas oligozonatus — ARTEAGA et al. 2018
Dipsas oligozonata — ARTEAGA et al. 2023 
DistributionEcuador

Type locality: ‘‘Zhila (2,250 m) 79°17’26”W,
03°39’45”S, parroquia Oña, cantón Girón, Provincia Azuay [Ecuador].’’  
Reproductionoviparous 
TypesHolotype: MEPN (also as EPN) 3612; additional specimens in AMNH, BMNH, MUSM 
DiagnosisDiagnosis: Sibynomorphus oligozonatus is a gray to grayish brown snake with broad dark crossbands anteriorly (narrowing and becoming broken into dorsal and lateral blotches posteriorly). Anterior crossbands are much broader than the interspaces and have regular, vertical edges and sometimes are offset. Posterior crossbands are usually much narrower than the interspaces. The venter is unmarked or has irregular dark speckling or spotting concentrated posteriorly. The head is foreshortened and blunt. The species has a low number of supralabials (6 or 7) and maxillary teeth (12–15). Males of S. oligozonatus have a low number of ventrals (145 in two males, 163 in another) and relatively long tail (24–26% of total length); these characters in the single known female (177 and 22%, respectively), are typical of some other species of Sibynomorphus (see Table 1). Scrocchi et al. (1993) questioned whether Sibynomorphus oligozonatus was diagnosable from S. vagrans on the basis of the characters given in the original description. However, these two species differ in head shape and proportions, as well as several scale characters. Sibynomorphus oligozonatus has a short head and blunt snout (Fig. 4), lacks preoculars in the known specimens (i.e., the preocular is fused with the prefrontal and only a loreal is present between the eye and posterior nasal), and has six or seven supralabials and fewer than 70 subcaudals. Sibynomorphus vagrans has a more elongate head and more pointed snout (compare Fig. 4 with Figs. 30, 31), has a preocular in addition to a loreal (occasionally 2 preoculars and a loreal), and has eight to 10 supralabials and more than 70 subcaudals (Table 1).
Sibynomorphus oligozonatus differs in color pattern from S. oneilli (see Figs. 8– 10). Both species have dark crossbands that are broader anteriorly than posteriorly (some S. oneilli lack bands; see following species account). In S. oligozonatus, the anterior crossbands are twice or more as broad as the pale interspaces, whereas on the anterior body in S. oneilli, the interspaces are about as broad as, or broader than, the dark crossbands. Sibynomorphus oneilli has a bold pattern of dark markings in an irregular checkerboard pattern or paired spots on each ventral plate, whereas the venter of S. oligozonatus is relatively unmarked (AMNH 110587 does have irregular dark speckling all over the venter and some larger spots that tend to be concentrated laterally, but this pattern does not resemble the heavily spotted venter of S. oneilli; see Figs. 9, 10, 12).
Sibynomorphus petersi occasionally has relatively broad anterior crossbands reminiscent of, but less regular than, those of S. oligozonatus. Sibynomorphus petersi has a preocular above the loreal (preocular absent in S. oligozonatus) and usually has eight supralabials (six or seven in S. oligozonatus). In addition, male S. petersi have more ventrals (164–183) than S. oligozonatus. Sibynomorphus petersi generally has a strongly patterned venter (Fig. 13 and following) compared with the relatively less patterned venter of S. oligozonatus. Sibynomorphus oligozonatus differs from S. vagus in color pattern: broad anterior crossbands having regular, more or less vertical borders in S. oligozonatus versus either nonbanded (a vague network or fine reticulations) or with narrow, poorly formed, and irregular crossbands in S. vagus. Sibynomorphus vagus has fewer ventrals in females, has a preocular scale, usually has a single primary temporal, and has seven or eight supralabials.
Sibynomorphus oligozonatus differs from S. williamsi in having fewer ventrals (males: 145–163 vs. 173–182; females: 177 vs. 181–188), in head shape (oligozonatus: head slightly broader than neck, short and blunt; williamsi: head broader than neck, longer and acuminate), and in some aspects of color pattern. In S. williamsi, the first dorsal crossband usually encroaches broadly onto the nuchal region (see Figs. 41, 42), whereas in S. oligozonatus, the first crossband is separated narrowly from the head by a distinct narrow pale collar (Fig. 4). The dorsal bands in S. williamsi are bold and distinct the whole length of the body and tail (even when fragmented into a dorsal and lateral series of blotches), whereas in S. oligozonatus, the anterior bands are much bolder than the posterior ones. In S. oligozonatus the dorsal blotches on the posterior body are slightly to much narrower than the pale interspaces; the posterior dorsal blotches in S. williamsi are equivalent to or wider than the pale interspaces. The color pattern of the BMNH and AMNH specimens of Sibynomorphus oligozonatus is reminiscent of some specimens of Dipsas oreas, which perhaps led Parker (1938) to refer the BMNH specimen to that species (as ‘‘Dipsas mikanii oreas’’). However, D. oreas usually has a pair of large oval dark irregular spots on the dorsoposterior portion (primarily parietal scales) of the head (Cadle, 2005: 101–108), a strongly compressed body, and a relatively much larger eye (compare Fig. 4 with Cadle, 2005, fig. 21). The relative eye diameter of the BMNH specimen of S. oligozonatus, the only adult with an undamaged head, was 0.51% of SVL, whereas for 12 adult D. oreas, the eye averaged 0.73  0.049% of SVL (range: 0.64–0.78%). Males of S. oligozonatus can be distinguished from D. oreas by having fewer ventrals (144–163 vs. 167–184 in D. oreas) and subcaudals (66–68 vs. 82–91 in D. oreas). The female referred to S. oligozonatus is similar to females of D. oreas except for a slightly lower subcaudal count (66 vs. 70–83) and the previously mentioned aspects of color pattern and body form. See Table 2 and Cadle (2005, table 1). (Cadle 2007)


Unfortunately we had to temporarily remove additional information as this was scraped by multiple AI companies who sell that data to their customers. These details, e.g. detailed descriptions or comparisons (about 6635 characters) are available for collaborators and contributors. Please contact us for details. 
CommentOnly known from the holotype.

Synonymy: Maybe a synonym of S. vagrans (fide SCROCCHI et al. 1993). Not listed in Zoological Record.

Distribution: not in Peru fide IUCN assessment.

Diet: primarily molluscs (T. de Lema, pers. comm., 16 Oct 2015).

Habitat: fully arboreal (Harrington et al. 2018). 
EtymologyNamed after Greek oligos (ὀλίγος), little, small, insignificant + Latin zonata, encircling band/marking. [“...El nombre, tomado del griego, se refiere a las escasas fajas transversas, mucho menos numerosas de lo que es usual en el género...”]. (from Esteban Lavilla, pers. comm., May 2024) 
References
  • Arteaga A, Salazar-Valenzuela D, Mebert K, Peñafiel N, Aguiar G, Sánchez-Nivicela JC, Pyron RA, Colston TJ, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Yánez-Muñoz MH, Venegas PJ, Guayasamin JM, Torres-Carvajal O 2018. Systematics of South American snail-eating snakes (Serpentes, Dipsadini), with the description of five new species from Ecuador and Peru. ZooKeys 766: 79-147 - get paper here
  • Arteaga, A., & Batista, A. 2023. A consolidated phylogeny of snail-eating snakes (Serpentes, Dipsadini), with the description of five new species from Colombia, Ecuador, and Panama. ZooKeys 1143: 1-49 - get paper here
  • Arteaga, A.; Bustamante, L.; Vieira, J. 2024. Reptiles of Ecuador. Khamai Foundation & Tropical Herping, 1073 pp. - get paper here
  • Cadle, J.E. 2007. The snake genus Sibynomorphus (Colubridae: Dipsadinae: Dipsadini) in Peru and Ecuador, with comments on the systematics of Dipsadini. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 158(5):183-283 - get paper here
  • Harrington, Sean M; Jordyn M de Haan, Lindsey Shapiro, Sara Ruane 2018. Habits and characteristics of arboreal snakes worldwide: arboreality constrains body size but does not affect lineage diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 125 (1): 61–71 - get paper here
  • Orces V., G. & A. Almendariz. 1989. Presencia en el Ecuador de los Colubridos del Genero Sibynomorphus. Rev. Politecnica, Vol. XIV, No. 2: 57-67.
  • Rossman, D. A.; Kizirian, D. A. 1993. Variation in the peruvian dipsadine snakes Sibynomorphus oneilli and S. vagus. Journal of Herpetology 27 (1): 87-90 - get paper here
  • Scrocchi G. Porto M. Rey L. 1993. Descripcion de una especie nueva y situacion del genero Sibynomorphus (Serpentes: Colubridae) en la Argentina. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE BIOLOGIA 53 (2): 197- 208.
  • Torres-Carvajal O, Pazmiño-Otamendi G, Salazar-Valenzuela D. 2019. Reptiles of Ecuador: a resource-rich portal, with a dynamic checklist and photographic guides. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 13 (1): [General Section]: 209–229 (e178) - get paper here
  • Wallach, Van; Kenneth L. Williams , Jeff Boundy 2014. Snakes of the World: A Catalogue of Living and Extinct Species. [type catalogue] Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 1237 pp.
 
External links  
Is it interesting? Share with others:


Please submit feedback about this entry to the curator