Tympanocryptis cephalus GÜNTHER, 1867
Can you confirm these amateur observations of Tympanocryptis cephalus?
|Higher Taxa||Agamidae (Amphibolurinae), Sauria, Iguania, Squamata (lizards)|
|Common Names||E: Coastal pebble-mimic dragon, Blotch-tailed Earless Dragon|
|Synonym||Tympanocryptis cephalus GÜNTHER 1867: 52|
Tympanocryptis cephalus — BOULENGER 1885: 393
Tympanocryptis cephalus cephalus — MITCHELL 1948
Tympanocryptis cephalus gigas MITCHELL 1948
Tympanocryptis cephalus gigas MITCHELL 1948
Tympanocryptis cephalus gigas — WORRELL 1963: 184
Tympanocryptis cephalus cephalus — WORRELL 1963: 184
Tympanocryptis cephalus cephalus — STORR 1964
Tympanocryptis cephala gigas — STORR 1964
Tympanocryptis cephalus gigas — WERMUTH 1967: 98
Tympanocryptis cephalus — WERMUTH 1967: 97
Tympanocryptis cephalus cephalus — WERMUTH 1967: 98
Tympanocryptis cephala — STORR 1982
Rotundacryptus cephalus — WELLS & WELLINGTON 1985: 19
Rotundacryptus gigas — WELLS & WELLINGTON 1985: 19
Tympanocryptis cephalus — COGGER 2000: 352
Tympanocryptis cephalus — PIANKA & VITT 2003: 68
|Distribution||Australia (Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia)|
gigas: Western Australia (from Ashburton River and the Great Sand Desert south to Dongara, Paynes Find and to the vicinity of Kalgoorlie); Type locality: Ashburton and gascoyne Rivers, Western Australia.
Type locality: Nicol Bay [= Nickol Bay = Karratha], Western Australia
|Types||Lectotype: BMNH 19220.127.116.11 (formerly one of 18.104.22.168-48), from Nickol (as Nicol) Bay, W. A., designated by Cogger 1983.|
|Diagnosis||Diagnosis. Distinguished from other Tympanocryptis by the following combination of character states: presence of two pre-cloacal pores, lack of longitudinal stripes on the dorsum, presence of enlarged scales with raised spines arranged in transverse rows, snout straight or convex, scales on snout with low keels, rostral width ~3–4 times height, weakly defined row of enlarged scales at anterior and dorsal edge of thigh, scales on dorsal surface of thigh not aligned, ventrals with low keels, and irregular dark blotches along midline of dorsum [Doughty et al. 2015].|
|Comment||Synonymy: Tympanocryptis cephalus gigas has been synonymized with the nominate form by STORR 1982 and other authors, but revalidated by Doughty et al. 2015.|
Type species: Tympanocryptis cephalus GÜNTHER 1867: 52 is the type species of the genus Rotundacryptus WELLS & WELLINGTON 1985: 19.
Comparisons with other species. Tympanocryptis cephalus is most likely to be confused with T. gigas, T. fortescuensis sp. nov., and T. diabolicus sp. nov., as these species all occur in the Pilbara or Gascoyne regions. Tympanocryptis cephalus is distinguished from T. gigas by possessing enlarged dorsal scales in short transverse rows on the dorsum (versus scattered spines not arranged in rows), scales on snout with low keels (versus rugose or with feeble keels), ventrals keeled (versus smooth), and smaller average body size.
From T. diabolicus sp. nov. and T. fortescuensis sp. nov., T. cephalus is distinguished by generally longer transverse rows of enlarged scales on dorsum (5–7 versus 2–5), slightly wider rostral (3.5 versus 3.0 times wider than high), enlarged row of scales at front of thigh not forming a conspicuous ridge, and usually possessing a series of dark blotches along the midline; further distinguished from T. diabolicus sp. nov. by scales on snout possessing low keels (versus rugose scales or feebly keeled) and scales on upper thigh not aligned.
From the more geographically distant T. pseudopsephos sp. nov., T. cephalus is distinguished by straight or convex snout (versus concave), low keels on snout (versus rugose or feebly keeled scales), rostral scale 3.5 times wider than high (versus 2 times), enlarged row of scales at front of thigh not forming a conspicuous ridge, keels on dorsal surface of upper arm not aligned, ventrals with low keels and spine protruding past posterior edge of scale (versus smooth with no spines), and more brownish coloration with vertebral series of irregular dark blotches [Doughty et al. 2015].
Habitat. Very little data exists on this species, but WAM specimen records indicate its occurrence on red rocky loams or clayey substrates, with Triodia, Snakewood (Acacia xiphophylla), or annual grasses as the vegetation type. The Pilbara Biodiversity Survey data also indicated a preference for clayey substrates (Doughty et al. 2011, 2015).
|Etymology||The word cephalus is a Latinized version of the Greek cephalos, meaning ‘head’. Presumably this refers to the distinctive short head of this this species relative to other Australian agamid lizards at the time of description, as no explicit etymology was given. We maintain usage of cephalus as a noun in apposition, in contrast to occasional use of cephala (e.g. Storr 1964, 1982, Doughty et al. 2015).|
As link to this species use URL address:
without field 'search_param'. Field 'search_param' is used for browsing search result.